<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Administration Just Says &#8216;No&#8217; to Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Grants California Fuel Emissions Waiver Request : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-59560</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Grants California Fuel Emissions Waiver Request : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-59560</guid>
		<description>[...] I can&#8217;t help but think this is a subtle dig at the previous incarnation of the EPA, where science didn&#8217;t exactly come to the fore all that often. This is a welcome step toward improving automobile emissions, which is an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can&#8217;t help but think this is a subtle dig at the previous incarnation of the EPA, where science didn&#8217;t exactly come to the fore all that often. This is a welcome step toward improving automobile emissions, which is an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama's Unprecedented Commitment to Science &#124; ecopolitology</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-56345</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama's Unprecedented Commitment to Science &#124; ecopolitology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-56345</guid>
		<description>[...] The scientific commitment made by President Obama is particularly poignant when contrasted with a Bush administration that was often perceived as ignoring — and even altering — scientific findings that did not jive with political agendas [see: Bush Administration Just Says No to Science]. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The scientific commitment made by President Obama is particularly poignant when contrasted with a Bush administration that was often perceived as ignoring — and even altering — scientific findings that did not jive with political agendas [see: Bush Administration Just Says No to Science]. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could Action on Climate Really Be Bush Legacy? : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-38379</link>
		<dc:creator>Could Action on Climate Really Be Bush Legacy? : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-38379</guid>
		<description>[...] light of my recent post about the demoralizing effect this administration has had upon EPA scientists and other agency &#8216;lifers&amp;#..., I was more than just a little surprised to hear about the story leaked in Monday&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] light of my recent post about the demoralizing effect this administration has had upon EPA scientists and other agency &#8216;lifers&amp;#&#8230;, I was more than just a little surprised to hear about the story leaked in Monday&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Lisa Jackson Supports California Emission Standards : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-22112</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Lisa Jackson Supports California Emission Standards : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-22112</guid>
		<description>[...] But during Jackson&#8217;s Senate confirmation hearing she went on to say, “Political appointees will not compromise the integrity of the EPA&#8217;s technical experts to advance particular regulatory outcomes.&#8221; The tone of her hearing focused on how the Bush-run EPA not only sucked, but that it had frequent disregard for scientific findings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But during Jackson&#8217;s Senate confirmation hearing she went on to say, “Political appointees will not compromise the integrity of the EPA&#8217;s technical experts to advance particular regulatory outcomes.&#8221; The tone of her hearing focused on how the Bush-run EPA not only sucked, but that it had frequent disregard for scientific findings. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Last Thing: Obama Would Regulate CO2 as a Pollutant Under Clean Air Act : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-12408</link>
		<dc:creator>One Last Thing: Obama Would Regulate CO2 as a Pollutant Under Clean Air Act : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-12408</guid>
		<description>[...] George W. Bush has declined to curb CO2 emissions under the auspices of the Clean Air Act, despite the fact that the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] George W. Bush has declined to curb CO2 emissions under the auspices of the Clean Air Act, despite the fact that the Supreme Court ruled in 2007 that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NS</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>NS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/14/bush-just-says-no-to-science/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>While other governments are busy giving subsidies to the public for buying EVs, the US government is proposing a tax holiday for gasoline, thereby practically sending out a &#039;drive more gas guzzlers&#039; message. Good for getting votes, but what cost to the environment? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While other governments are busy giving subsidies to the public for buying EVs, the US government is proposing a tax holiday for gasoline, thereby practically sending out a &#039;drive more gas guzzlers&#039; message. Good for getting votes, but what cost to the environment? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

