<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore Drilling and a 10 Year Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/18/offshore-drilling-and-a-10-year-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/18/offshore-drilling-and-a-10-year-plan/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daisy Greene</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/18/offshore-drilling-and-a-10-year-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator>Daisy Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=511#comment-4997</guid>
		<description>The first question we all need to get answered is: why will it take 10 years (TEN, count &#039;em) after the drilling ban is lifted before we can take advantage of the oil? 
 
The main reason is infrastructure, which means how we get the oil from the oil well to homes and businesses. 
As in, for example, pipelines. 
 
  To do that, oil companies need to pass  environmental hurdles that are extremely time-consuming. Why aren&#039;t we asking, instead:  Gee, how long would it take if there were no environmental hurdles? 
 
This is such a critical issue because even if it is wind power or solar, it needs to be delivered from its source.  Same issue:  environmental regulations. 
 
Let&#039;s examine how we have tied ourselves into such tight environmental knots that we have allowed ourselves to become engaged in the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world, and it is being transferred from us, to our enemies. 
 
We can&#039;t have our cake and eat it too. There are tough, grown-up choices to be made. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first question we all need to get answered is: why will it take 10 years (TEN, count &#039;em) after the drilling ban is lifted before we can take advantage of the oil?</p>
<p>The main reason is infrastructure, which means how we get the oil from the oil well to homes and businesses.</p>
<p>As in, for example, pipelines.</p>
<p>  To do that, oil companies need to pass  environmental hurdles that are extremely time-consuming. Why aren&#039;t we asking, instead:  Gee, how long would it take if there were no environmental hurdles?</p>
<p>This is such a critical issue because even if it is wind power or solar, it needs to be delivered from its source.  Same issue:  environmental regulations.</p>
<p>Let&#039;s examine how we have tied ourselves into such tight environmental knots that we have allowed ourselves to become engaged in the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world, and it is being transferred from us, to our enemies.</p>
<p>We can&#039;t have our cake and eat it too. There are tough, grown-up choices to be made. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gore, Grove, Pickens - All Have Energy Plans, All Mistakingly Marginalize Nuclear Power Potential : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/18/offshore-drilling-and-a-10-year-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Gore, Grove, Pickens - All Have Energy Plans, All Mistakingly Marginalize Nuclear Power Potential : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 03:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=511#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>[...] Boone Pickens Says Peak Oil Reached, Plans World’s Largest Wind Farm Offshore Drilling and a 10 Year Plan Solving Energy Crisis Demands a Sustained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boone Pickens Says Peak Oil Reached, Plans World’s Largest Wind Farm Offshore Drilling and a 10 Year Plan Solving Energy Crisis Demands a Sustained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Adams</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/18/offshore-drilling-and-a-10-year-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-3777</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=511#comment-3777</guid>
		<description>One thing that troubles me is the focus by some on immediate results. America did not get into its present energy situation overnight and will not solve the problem with a crash program that focuses on only short term solutions. There is no equivalent of gastric bypass surgery here and even if there was, I would not recommend it. 
 
For example, it is going to take some time to undo the effects of 30 years worth of not building new nuclear power plants. We have people who know what they are doing, but their skills are a bit rusty and they want to move cautiously and get it right. 
 
The fact that it may take 10-12 years to build our first new nuclear plant (from the time of project start, which is actually a couple of years in the past) is not terribly troubling when one considers that the new plant has a likelihood of operating for 60-80 years based on what we can see from our existing plants. 
 
Drilling off shore is also hard work, but look what happened in Norway and Great Britain when they discovered oil and gas in the North Sea. In each case, they developed excellent technology and supplied abundant, low cost energy for several decades. Sure, there is no panacea, but we will be using large quantities of controllable energy for as long as we have a functioning society, so we need to keep investing in new supplies to replace the ones that we are using. 
 
Weather dependent sources like the sun and wind are destined to forever be supplements that show up when and where they want. I like power supplies that free me from the weather, not those that make me even more vulnerable when bad weather happens. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that troubles me is the focus by some on immediate results. America did not get into its present energy situation overnight and will not solve the problem with a crash program that focuses on only short term solutions. There is no equivalent of gastric bypass surgery here and even if there was, I would not recommend it.</p>
<p>For example, it is going to take some time to undo the effects of 30 years worth of not building new nuclear power plants. We have people who know what they are doing, but their skills are a bit rusty and they want to move cautiously and get it right.</p>
<p>The fact that it may take 10-12 years to build our first new nuclear plant (from the time of project start, which is actually a couple of years in the past) is not terribly troubling when one considers that the new plant has a likelihood of operating for 60-80 years based on what we can see from our existing plants.</p>
<p>Drilling off shore is also hard work, but look what happened in Norway and Great Britain when they discovered oil and gas in the North Sea. In each case, they developed excellent technology and supplied abundant, low cost energy for several decades. Sure, there is no panacea, but we will be using large quantities of controllable energy for as long as we have a functioning society, so we need to keep investing in new supplies to replace the ones that we are using.</p>
<p>Weather dependent sources like the sun and wind are destined to forever be supplements that show up when and where they want. I like power supplies that free me from the weather, not those that make me even more vulnerable when bad weather happens. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

