Deptartment of Energy to Provide $36 Million for Carbon Capture Projects

coal fired power plantThe U.S. Department of Energy announced today that it will provide $36 million for 15 projects to further the development of new technologies for the capture of carbon dioxide from the existing fleet of coal-fired power plants. Today’s 15 project announcements will focus on five areas of interest for CO2 capture: membranes, solvents, sorbents, oxycombustion, and chemical looping.

“Currently, the existing U.S. coal fleet accounts for over half of all electricity generated in this country,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Samuel W. Bodman said in a release. “The projects announced today will combat climate change and help meet current and future energy needs by curbing CO2 emissions from existing coal-fired plants.”

But carbon capture and sequestration, along with “clean coal” are still perceived by many as mythical technologies that are simply not cost effective.

My question is this: If carbon capture and sequestration is such a central component of President Bush’s broader energy vision, why aren’t they doing more about it?  To put things in perspective, since 2001 the Bush administration has invested more than $2.5 billion in clean coal research and development - roughly the same amount it spends per week on the Iraq war.

Oh, and that $36 million figure mentioned at the top of this article? $36 million is roughly equal to what the U.S. spends on the Iraq war in two and a half hours.

Read more about the specific projects receiving funding at the DOE’s website.

Other posts on the DOE and carbon capture/sequestration:

Photo: hAdamsky via flickr under a Creative Commons License

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Scottish highlands

Environmental Protest Round-Up 25 September 2009

In Peru, the government has acted on the financially troubled and environmentally challenged Doe Run Peru smelter. Their response to the closure of the site has been to give the operators a 30-month extension on their previous environmental clean-up deadline.

Is Nuclear “The Best Solution On Climate Change”?

A few weeks ago Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) called for a new energy solution. A solution that came in the form of 100 new nuclear power plants. That vision has not left the republicans’ eyes. And on Tuesday, Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) added his two cents.

3 Comments

  1. “Clean coal” is like a penis enlargement pill for the energy industry. It’s funded because we *so* want it to be true…

  2. DOE to Provide $36 Million for Carbon Capture Projects | Deliggit.com…

    \r\nThe U.S. Department of Energy announced today that it will provide $36 millio…

  3. [...] Canadian Environment Minister Jim Prentice speak too presumptively on Friday when he said the capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide is already proven and being applied on a commercial basis? [...]

Tell us what you think: