Putin, Russia and the North

PutinWhile not new news to any readers who follow international relations, what does it mean when Russian scientists have claimed that the 1,220-mile long underwater Lomonosov Ridge is geologically linked to the Siberian continental platform? While not the start in a race for unclaimed territory, it is simply the latest salvo in an on-going dispute over which nations will be able to control what part of the Arctic, and therefore the ability to exploit or protect.By claiming the Lomonosov Ridge as Russian territory, Russia has claimed the Arctic seabed up until the North Pole, effectively planting a Russian flag on the vast oil, gas, and diamond reserves in this ecologically-sensitive region of the world.

How is it that Russia is able to claim the North Pole and the Lomonosov Ridge? The 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea allows for Arctic nations to map out the seabed in order to show that the attached continental shelf extends past the 200 nautical mile exclusion zone, therefore giving the sovereign country exclusive economic rights to the mineral, oil and gas reserves found therein.

Considering the past few years’ mineral and oil prices, it’s not that big a surprise to observers that Arctic nations are scrambling to claim what they feel is rightly theirs. The questions we should be asking should not only be about who is going to end up controlling what. Where national borders and exclusion zones are drawn is an important question related to national pride, sovereignty and economy that will be solved through a deliberative and political process involving scientists, Arctic nations, the United Nations and tremendous amounts of paperwork. As interested observers (and in some cases, citizens of implicated nations), we should also question whether or not the Arctic should be exploited, or if it should be protected.

For More Posts on the Arctic and the Environment:

Photo Credit: World Economic Forum through Flickr

<script>reddit_url=’[URL]‘</script>
<script>reddit_title=’[TITLE]‘</script>

<script type=”text/javascript” src=”http://www.reddit.com/button.js?t=2″></script>

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Scottish highlands

Environmental Protest Round-Up 25 September 2009

In Peru, the government has acted on the financially troubled and environmentally challenged Doe Run Peru smelter. Their response to the closure of the site has been to give the operators a 30-month extension on their previous environmental clean-up deadline.

Is Nuclear “The Best Solution On Climate Change”?

A few weeks ago Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) called for a new energy solution. A solution that came in the form of 100 new nuclear power plants. That vision has not left the republicans’ eyes. And on Tuesday, Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) added his two cents.

4 Comments

  1. [...] Putin, Russia and the North [...]

  2. [...] President Medvedev at an earlier Sept. meeting in Moscow: “This region is of strategic importance for the country. We must reliably ensure Russia’s national interests in the Arctic for a long [...]

  3. [...] circumstances”, like the country’s controversial claims to large portions of the Arctic shelf. With the possible opening of the NorthWest Passage and the subsequent opening of natural resource [...]

  4. [...] change by the White House has only further raised the stakes for the Arctic. As detailed in former posts, one of the significant effects of our changing climate is the thinning of the ice pack in the [...]

Tell us what you think: