The Proposed Neutering of Our Endangered Species Act
On Monday, the Bush administration proposed a policy that threatens to weaken the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to the point of extinction. This comes as no surprise. Like the war in Iraq, removing the fetters of environmental protection has been an administrational goal since 2001. Unlike the war in Iraq, this time Bush and his cronies could very well succeed.
Targeting the ESA’s consultation process, the policy changes boil down to this: only when a federal agency feels their intended actions could bring about harm must they consult an outside agency like the Fish and Wildlife Service. Currently, all of these decisions are subject to an independent scientific review.
If the ambiguity of that policy makes you uncomfortable then please raise your hand because it scares the crap out of me.
First off, our current administration has been, if anything, consistent in its attempt to sidestep environmental policy over the past seven years. Consider this, Bush’s administration has only added about 60 species to the endangered species list. That is about 10-percent of what was listed under the Clinton administration, and only about 3-percent of what the Reagan administration listed. Even George Bush’s dad added around 200 species to the list!
Wait, it gets better. This whole process is incredibly sneaky. These suggested changes are not even subject to Congressional approval. Outside of that, the Interior Department is only allowing comments on the proposal for 30 days, and in an attempt to reduce public outcry they are not accepting any comments via email - snail mail only!
If this sounds sketch, it should. With the proposed changes, for example, agencies won’t even be required to assess how their projects will contribute to global warming, or the effect of those emissions on species and habitat. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Of course, we won’t have many of those around if these changes are allowed.
Fact is, this proposal is obscene and another wicked example of the Bush administration circumventing the law. And don’t let them fool you…the consequences are grand, such that we ourselves might might make the endangered list.
Take Action:
Related Posts:
Where Issues Intertwine: Why Animals Matter
Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?
Alaska Sues to End the Polar Bear
Image source: Voices at Flickr
They are not accepting emails, but they are in fact accepting online comments.
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&o=09000064806c5826
Click on the little yellow thought bubble to comment.
The reason they are not accepting emails is to avoid spam. As far as I know, this is standard practice for all changes now.
The amount of time they’re keeping this open for comment, and the fact that it’s not subject to congressional approval is ridiculous.
Re: Nimic
Thanks for the link, and for pointing out the reason behind not accepting email.
I have to say, if that is the reason, I am not a fan. All avenues of communication should be open.
Thanks again!
what do you have against the war in Iraq?
It’s a just war when only idiots can think that opposite.
re: robert
What do I have against the Iraq war? Hmm. That is a blog post in itself.
[...] the wake of the decision by the Bush administration to try and neuter the Endangered Species Act, environmental groups across America have come out in [...]
Perhaps what people should do is spread the word and along with themselves send SNAIL-MAIL to those in charge of this! Just because they want to try and silence us doesn’t mean they can, and I will definitely spread the word!
re: Carolina
I agree. Luckily some online organizations also jumped in to help get the word to them. The web is such a resource, so thank god!
[...] The Proposed Neutering of our Endangered Species Act Tags: bush administration, climate change, emissions, endangered species act, global warming, polar bears, wildlife agencies [...]
[...] outgoing Bush administration is proposing to rush through legislation that will remove the right of government experts to ensure that dams, highways and other big [...]