Wisconsin Looks to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

WisconsinWisconsin’s Governor’s Task Force on Global Warming has recommended that the state achieve 2005 levels by 2014; reduce emissions by 22% from 2005 levels by 2022 (someone one day will have to explain to me the fascination with number alliteration); and finally, it calls for 75% reductions from 2005 levels by 2050.

The task force has also recommended a two-pronged approach, adopting state level support for either a federal or state-level cap and trade program, as well as a series of policy recommendations for several important state industry sectors:

  1. Energy Sector
  2. Transportation Sector
  3. Agriculture and Forestry Sectors
  4. Industry Sector
  5. Waste Sector

The task force “strongly prefers a broad-based, multi-sector, mandatory federal Cap and Trade Program that is fair to Wisconsin and recommends that the state actively participate in designing such a program”. It also goes on to recommend that Wisconsin participate in the MidWestern Governor’s Association’s work on a regional cap and trade program. Most interestingly, the report ends off by saying that regardless if there is a national or regional cap and trade program, recommends a unique design for the Cap and Trade Program during a transition period to mitigate what may be substantial initial costs for regulated utilities and their customers and large industry as a result of uncertain GHG emission allowance prices, particularly while low-carbon technologies are under development.

Some of the more radical policy recommendations proposed include:

  • Removing economic disincentives for utilities to aggressively promote and invest in conservation and efficiency measures;
  • Promoting water conservation to reduce water utilities electrical bills;
  • Setting a goal of 25% of electricity being from renewable sources by 2025;
  • Modifying the existing moratorium on nuclear power plants to allow that option to be considered in the future;
  • Adopting California standards for auto and light truck GHG emissions; and
  • Increasing the use of anaerobic digesters to produce biogas/methane from animal manure through subsidies or tax credits.

So, who’s the first to comment with a cow manure joke?

For More on States and Renewable Energy:

 Photo Credit: chefranden via Flickr’s Media Commons

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Senator Inhofe Vows a “Full Investigation” into “Suppressed” EPA Report on Climate Change

Senator Inhofe calls for a “full investigation” into what he terms as a cover-up of scientific data that “vindicates” his position that global warming is hoax. It’s either that or an increasingly desperate attempt to support an untenable position.

Sarah Palin on Energy: What a Switch!

Am I the only one who noticed that Sarah Palin has pulled a huge switchover when it comes to her take on energy policy?

Because it’s dramatic, and may presage the switch that I have been hoping for for a while: the divorce of the idea that a Conservative Environmentalist in politics is an oxymoron.

One Comment

  1. [...] Wisconsin Looks to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions [...]

Tell us what you think: