Energy Independence is Idiocy, Inanity….Just Plain Senseless, Proclaims John Stossel

In an August 20th article for Real Clear Politics and an August 21st editorial written for the New York Sun, John Stossel heralds the “idiocy” or “inanity” of energy independence. Mr. Stossel explains, in his opinion, this goal is not worthy because he believes American energy independence includes the end of American energy trade in the global market. He expounds on this idea with details of backlash that could occur as the result of only relying on ourselves for energy, food and security. Why am I bringing these articles to your attention?

John Stossel is a prominent figure in American media. A well established, tenured journalist writing for several publications, and the co-host of ABC News’s 20/20. His role in the media undoubtedly influences people. Respectfully considering his broad knowledge of American politics, policy and media influence on these matters, this extreme view of an energy independent America is concerning and thought provoking.

Does energy independence for America mean that we have to extinguish all trade and global relationships? Or can energy independence for America consist of developing our technologies and resources to the point that we have the ability to sustain ourselves while still choosing to participate in the global market?

Ron Bengston, in his essay The Cost of American Energy Independence states:

How much will energy independence cost the American people? Before the answer can be given and understood, the definition of energy independence needs to be clarified. It is important to first understand that independence does not mean closed borders or isolation. The dictionary definition of independence is: “freedom from outside interference and the right to self-government.” Energy Independence means energy sovereignty; a concept that should be thought of much like we think of national independence. For example, the USA has interdependent relationships with other countries, both economically and militarily — however, if America’s economic or military “interdependence” becomes “dependence” to the point of undermining national sovereignty, there will be a public outcry… much like we see today regarding America’s oil dependence.

Clearly defining energy independence is a critical step in this process. As we hear politicians speaking and media outlets reporting on this topic, we need to understand how they define energy independence. What we learn here is that John Stossel views an energy independent America as extreme isolation from global markets with untold negative results. Ron Bengston views an energy independent America as a strong sovereign nation with a place in the global market. How do you define energy independence?

It is imperative that we stay informed and active in this process. “Energy Independence” has become a buzz word, a common phrase we hear from politicians, commercials, and news reports. To be informed citizens and voters we must define the issues for ourselves and then understand the perspective of those to whom we are listening.

As we approach November this year it is vital to understand Barack Obama and John McCain both have plans to pursue and energy independent America. Which plan fits what you see as the best pursuit for our country?

Related Posts:

• Consumer-First Energy Act 2008 Lacks Support
• First Sustainable Ethanol to Mass Market?
• BLM Applying NEPA to Large Scale Solar Energy on Public Lands

Photo Credit: Riah’s Photography via Flickr with permission