<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Green Party Leader Banned from Televised Debates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KANE PARK</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-185871</link>
		<dc:creator>KANE PARK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-185871</guid>
		<description>wow that sucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that sucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canadian Green Party Leader in the Debates : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-46115</link>
		<dc:creator>Canadian Green Party Leader in the Debates : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-46115</guid>
		<description>[...] that raising a fuss, and threatening to go to court can pay results. As recounted earlier in this post, Elizabeth May, leader of the Canadian Green Party was being prevented from participating in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that raising a fuss, and threatening to go to court can pay results. As recounted earlier in this post, Elizabeth May, leader of the Canadian Green Party was being prevented from participating in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiel Blajchman</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-8540</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-8540</guid>
		<description>She is. See post: Canadian Green Party Leader in the Debates; &lt;a href=&quot;http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/canadian-green-party-leader-in-the-debates/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/canadian-gr...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is. See post: Canadian Green Party Leader in the Debates; <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/canadian-green-party-leader-in-the-debates/" rel="nofollow">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/canadian-gr&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>what is the problem? Why can she not be in the debates? Is she not running for PM? Is this not a democratic country? What&#039;s going on here? What are they afraid of? They know that she will sway votes because she wants to bring up hard subjects, which they have no good policies for! I for one want to hear what she has to say and she has every right to say whatever she wants! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the problem? Why can she not be in the debates? Is she not running for PM? Is this not a democratic country? What&#039;s going on here? What are they afraid of? They know that she will sway votes because she wants to bring up hard subjects, which they have no good policies for! I for one want to hear what she has to say and she has every right to say whatever she wants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elle</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-8053</link>
		<dc:creator>Elle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-8053</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Jonna - I think the other party leaders are scared of her as they will have to deal with environmental issues and pressure that otherwise would not come up! Can&#039;t wait for the debates! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Jonna &#8211; I think the other party leaders are scared of her as they will have to deal with environmental issues and pressure that otherwise would not come up! Can&#039;t wait for the debates!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonna</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-7212</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-7212</guid>
		<description>To allow the other leaders to decide whether or not to have an able competitor is a clear conflict of interests.  Of course they don&#039;t want her alongside them at the debates - she&#039;d blow them out of the water. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To allow the other leaders to decide whether or not to have an able competitor is a clear conflict of interests.  Of course they don&#039;t want her alongside them at the debates &#8211; she&#039;d blow them out of the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiel Blajchman</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-7132</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-7132</guid>
		<description>Hi J, 
 
You make some good points. I would argue though, that if the television networks told the party leaders that she was participating, they would still show up. I mean, at heart, no political party leader has missed a televised debate (even back when there was Reform and Progressive Conservative on the right side... somewhat making Stephen Harper&#039;s comments on the Green Party being an ally of the Liberals disingenuous). 
 
As well, what political leader is going to pass up free air time to further promote their platform, and attack their competitors? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi J,</p>
<p>You make some good points. I would argue though, that if the television networks told the party leaders that she was participating, they would still show up. I mean, at heart, no political party leader has missed a televised debate (even back when there was Reform and Progressive Conservative on the right side&#8230; somewhat making Stephen Harper&#039;s comments on the Green Party being an ally of the Liberals disingenuous).</p>
<p>As well, what political leader is going to pass up free air time to further promote their platform, and attack their competitors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/09/canadian-green-party-leader-banned-from-televised-debates/comment-page-1/#comment-7110</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=937#comment-7110</guid>
		<description>I think most would agree that it is not p to party leaders to decide who gets to participate in the televised debates. It is, however, up to party leaders whether they themselves wish to participate.  Here, Messrs. Harper and Layton have threatened to boycott the debates if Ms. May is included.  The networks then have to decide whether to hold a debate without May, one without Harper and Layton, or a combination of the two.  If the consortium had guts and/or thought there would be sufficient public interest to warrant the expense (remember TVA, Global and CTV exist to make $$), they&#039;d go for option #3 by holding a second series of debates with May, Dion and Duceppe. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most would agree that it is not p to party leaders to decide who gets to participate in the televised debates. It is, however, up to party leaders whether they themselves wish to participate.  Here, Messrs. Harper and Layton have threatened to boycott the debates if Ms. May is included.  The networks then have to decide whether to hold a debate without May, one without Harper and Layton, or a combination of the two.  If the consortium had guts and/or thought there would be sufficient public interest to warrant the expense (remember TVA, Global and CTV exist to make $$), they&#039;d go for option #3 by holding a second series of debates with May, Dion and Duceppe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

