<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NM-Senate: GOP All But Concedes Race to Tom Udall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/nm-senate-gop-all-but-concedes-race-to-tom-udall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/nm-senate-gop-all-but-concedes-race-to-tom-udall/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Shelton</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/nm-senate-gop-all-but-concedes-race-to-tom-udall/comment-page-1/#comment-7375</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Shelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=949#comment-7375</guid>
		<description>Wade- 
thanks for that info. that poll must have just been released (or updated on Pollster) in the last day. Even though the previous poll at the margin at 8, the trend line was still significantly in favor of Udall.  
 
the fact that Pearce is getting back into the race is probably attributed to the Chamber of Commerce endorsement and ads being run in his favor. 
 
The averages still have Udall up by 10 points though. No cause for alarm yet. but you&#039;re right, that Rasmussen poll does mix things up a bit. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wade-</p>
<p>thanks for that info. that poll must have just been released (or updated on Pollster) in the last day. Even though the previous poll at the margin at 8, the trend line was still significantly in favor of Udall. </p>
<p>the fact that Pearce is getting back into the race is probably attributed to the Chamber of Commerce endorsement and ads being run in his favor.</p>
<p>The averages still have Udall up by 10 points though. No cause for alarm yet. but you&#039;re right, that Rasmussen poll does mix things up a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/nm-senate-gop-all-but-concedes-race-to-tom-udall/comment-page-1/#comment-7369</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=949#comment-7369</guid>
		<description>You might want to update this. The latest poll shows Pearce cutting Udall&#039;s lead once again, so now there is only a 7 point difference between the two. The fact that the NRSC isn&#039;t helping them with funds and yet they are still climbing ahead in the polls is to be noted. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to update this. The latest poll shows Pearce cutting Udall&#039;s lead once again, so now there is only a 7 point difference between the two. The fact that the NRSC isn&#039;t helping them with funds and yet they are still climbing ahead in the polls is to be noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford J. Wirth, P</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/nm-senate-gop-all-but-concedes-race-to-tom-udall/comment-page-1/#comment-7292</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford J. Wirth, P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=949#comment-7292</guid>
		<description>According to most independent scientific studies, global oil production will now decline from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time demand will increase 14%.  
 
This is equivalent to a 33% drop in 7 years. No one can reverse this trend, nor can we conserve our way out of this catastrophe. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always exceed production levels; thus oil depletion  will continue steadily until all recoverable oil is extracted.  
 
Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment. 
 
Surviving Peak Oil: We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from &quot;outside,&quot; and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.  
 
This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html&lt;/a&gt;  
 
I used to live in NH-USA, but moved to a sustainable place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area with a good climate and good soil? Email: clifford dot wirth at yahoo dot com or give me a phone call which operates here as my old USA-NH number 603-668-4207. &lt;a href=&quot;http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to most independent scientific studies, global oil production will now decline from 74 million barrels per day to 60 million barrels per day by 2015. During the same time demand will increase 14%. </p>
<p>This is equivalent to a 33% drop in 7 years. No one can reverse this trend, nor can we conserve our way out of this catastrophe. Because the demand for oil is so high, it will always exceed production levels; thus oil depletion  will continue steadily until all recoverable oil is extracted. </p>
<p>Alternatives will not even begin to fill the gap. And most alternatives yield electric power, but we need liquid fuels for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, ships, and mining equipment.</p>
<p>Surviving Peak Oil: We are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from &quot;outside,&quot; and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems. </p>
<p>This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: <a href="http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html</a>  </p>
<p>I used to live in NH-USA, but moved to a sustainable place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area with a good climate and good soil? Email: clifford dot wirth at yahoo dot com or give me a phone call which operates here as my old USA-NH number 603-668-4207. <a href="http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

