Sarah Palin’s Record on Killing Wolves is Brutal

The Republican vice presidential nominee’s Alaskan administration has not only supported the aerial hunting of adult wolves, but also the slaughter of their pups.

aerial wolf kill

Sarah Palin’s record is not very favorable for wildlife. She’s put efforts into undoing federal wildlife protections for polar bears and beluga whales in order to protect oil and gas drilling operations, for example. But her position on wolf hunting is perhaps the most controversial.

One of Palin’s first acts in office was to put a $150 bounty on the heads of her state’s wolves, allegedly with the goal of increasing the moose and caribou population. But this was no ordinary hunt - it was meant to incentivize the aerial killing of wolves, in which private hunters take a small plane and chase down wolf packs until they’re exhausted and can’t move any more, when they either shoot them from the air or land and execute them at point blank range. A Defenders of Wildlife ad illustrating this process is available at ClimateProgress.

Even worse, now Palin’s administration is allowing its “Department of Wildlife Conservation” to enter into wolf dens and slaughter wolf pups, even though Alaska law specifically prohibits this activity (Regulation 5AAC 92.110(i)). According to Defenders of Wildlife:

“Over the past year, the state has produced several publications as part of its $400,000 public education campaign designed to inform Alaskans about the facts of its programs. Our scientific and legal review of this information has found similar omissions of critical information including overstating the impact of predation on moose and caribou populations and failing to recognize the importance of other limiting factors. The state’s recent omission of important facts regarding its control efforts in its ‘public education’ materials appears to be clearly intentional and designed to influence the vote on the pending ballot measure regarding the aerial hunting of wolves and bears. One has to wonder if the department tried to keep the killing of these wolf pups under wraps because of the upcoming vote.

It would be an understatement to say the Palin Administration’s wildlife and environmental record leaves something to be desired.

Sources: Democratic Courage, Climate Progress, Defenders of Wildlife

Articles Related to Sarah Palin:

Image courtesy of In Defense of Animals

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Mean Joe Green #37: Coal’s New Look

The EPA’s Appeals Board ruled last Thursday that coal-fired power plants must limit CO2 emissions.

Good news! Although it’s shocking that it took this long for a ruling that would limit CO2 emissions from new coal-fired power plants…

Nike, Starbucks Demand Congress To Act On Climate Change

Five leading companies joined Ceres today to announce a business coalition demanding stronger U.S. climate and energy legislation as early as 2009.

3 Comments

  1. This ad campaign is being shown in Ohio.

    With funding it will be shown in Florida.

    Support it by contributing to the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund (Palin Aerial Hunting TV Ad specifically) at:

    http://www.defendersactionfund.org/

  2. Shame, shame on you, SARAH PALIN! These are God’s creatures. You have no right to kill them.
    I thought about voting for you when I heard your speech at the Repuplican Convention, as you were so great. NO MORE! YOU ARE A CRUEL PERSON. To even think of killing these poor animals is awful. Think again Sarah, if you want to be the vice president!

  3. If you do not believe in killing any of God’s creatures, you are advised to read Obama’s views on abortion, live birth abortion and the born alive infant protection act (BAIPA).
    You can be pro animal rights and pro choice all you want- but if you are against killing- then you should be against abortion/live birth abortion/ and be FOR the BAIPA- which Obama voted against 4 times. This act would stated that all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted.
    Do some reasearch, like this- http://mydryfly.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/obama-and-live-birth-abortion/

    So are you saying that human life is less important than animal life? Or are you saying they are equal?
    Are you saying that Obama’s views are more humane than Sarah Palin’s?
    Really now.

Tell us what you think: