California PUC Votes Against Passage of Upcoming Renewable Energy Ballot Proposal
The California Public Utilities Commission voted unanimously Thursday to oppose Proposition 7, the Solar and Clean Energy Act of 2008, a ballot measure that would order California utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources by 2025. Some California pundits also refer to Proposition as “Big Solar.”
The CPUC is opposed to the measure primarily because “it would establish an excessively rigid, and potentially unworkable, structure for the further development of renewable energy in California,” the agency said in a press release. The CPUC said that the structure of the measure might in the short term hinder the state’s aggressive renewable energy goals by interfering with programs already under way.
Supporters of the measure argue that it would make California the world leader in clean power technology and help create over 370,000 new high wage jobs. Opponents argue that the good intentions of the proposition are overshadowed by how poorly written the document is, and that the ambiguities created by its passage would undoubtedly precipitate a raft of unintended consequences.
In a very aggressive move (one that may ultimately doom the ballot proposal), the measure would also make municipal utilities comply with the same renewable portfolio standards that apply to the investor-owned utilities.
A poll released on July 22, 2008 showed Proposition 7 had relatively strong support amongst Californians, with 63% supporting it and 24% opposing it (82% of those surveyed had no initial awareness of Proposition 7). But the future passage of the ballot measure now remains very much in question. As of early August, the state’s three investor owned utilities – PG&E Corp., Southern California Edison, and Sempra, the parent of San Diego Gas & Electric – had pitched-in more than $23 million to defeat the measure, including $12.9 million from PG&E.
Registered voters in California will have the opportunity to vote on the ballot proposal in the upcoming November 4 election.
>> California residents, learn about your home’s solar potential with Renewzle’s solar power calculator.
Related Posts:
Pennsylvania Get $650 Million Renewable Energy Fund
Transmission Politics Hold Up Utility-Scale Solar
Sacramento Business Journal
Image Credit: Laurenatclemson via flickr under a Creative Commons License
I’m all for clean energy, but if the bill was unanimously voted against, and it was poorly written, then that’s fine. You can’t just say you want clean energy, you need to make a workable plan to achieve it.
I think the best thing to do is to read the initiative and maybe get some unbiased info from ballot pedia: http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_7_(2008). The juicy info we’re really getting from this article is the fact that the utilities are funding the opposition (of course – why would they want to be penalized for not meeting the RPS standards and just producing Cali energy from nuclear plants?). So basically – the utility companies are going to say whatever they want incl. that the bill is poorly written – to defeat Prop 7. Muy interesante. Better to read up on your own!
“excessively rigid” and “potentially unworkable”. AB32, our current “first in the world” piece of legislation requiring IOU’s to meet an RPS of 20% by 2010 has fallen off in terms of regulation. Utilities dropped from about 14% down to the current 10.9% in the past years and don’t face much penalty for non-compliance, an under-whopping $25 million maximum fine. These companies already paid that much in their opposition campaign to avoid a more “rigid” penalty in the future that lifts the $25mil. cap. Not excessive, simply fair. These companies can handle that amount easily and it’s part of the reason why they haven’t utilized more renewables. As to “potentially unworkable”… it’s going to work. It simply amends current law so that the law DOES work and CONTINUES to work well. It addresses what hasn’t worked in past legislation and provides solutions. This is another reason why there is so much opposition, the fix to the problems is coming from outside of traditional groups that have failed to amend the problems. Big bruise to egos when an outsider comes in and fixes things insiders have gotten wrong – intentionally or not.