Is Freedom from Foreign Oil a Worthy Goal?

joyful jumping“Our oil addiction hamstrings America’s foreign policy and military, contributes to global warming and has robbed the nation of trillions of dollars. One of the country’s leading energy modelers estimates that foreign-oil dependence cost our economy $750 billion this year, a little more than the daunting price tag of the proposed Wall Street bailout.”

In the Chicago Tribune today,

What is energy independence? What does it mean for America? An extreme view of Energy Independence involves complete global market isolation which erupts in negative results on many fronts. Another view involves a combined effort of pursuing domestic oil and alternative energy sources. Creating energy domestically on all fronts, essentially making us stronger participants in the global market.

The cost and effort necessary to become energy independent is much more than either Barak Obama or John McCain are laying out in their energy plans for America. In their article, Jim Tankersley and Christi Parsons, detail each candidates energy plan and candidly point out how each is flawed. As energy buzz words are thrown around by politicians and the media, Americans must stay informed. Defining what energy independence means to them and then not being swayed by the spin cycle.

I applaud you who are searching for truth, thinking and discussing the issues at hand. I applaud you who are making lifestyle changes to create a more sustainable future for your country. As we face uncertain times economically and our security seems weak, I believe the people of America can create change. Pursuing change in your everyday life, will make a difference. Don’t give up!

Related Posts:

Energy Independence is Idiocy, Inanity…Just Plain Senseless, Proclaims John Stossel

BioTown USA: Is Total Energy Self-Sufficiencey Possible?

Republicans Work to Reconcile Their (oil) Platform With McCain’s Climate Change Thingy

Photo Credit: <kian> via Flickr Creative Commons License

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

The Other “Party of No”

The Obama administration is struggling to follow through on promises with regard to health care and climate change because of a Republican party that seems to have no interest in constructive efforts to solve problems for the American people.

Is Nuclear “The Best Solution On Climate Change”?

A few weeks ago Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) called for a new energy solution. A solution that came in the form of 100 new nuclear power plants. That vision has not left the republicans’ eyes. And on Tuesday, Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) added his two cents.

One Comment

  1. A nice idea – but at what cost? not just financial but how much of americas natural beauty & coastal towns are worth destroying?

Tell us what you think: