<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America’s Environmental Policy: Tactic or Strategy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%e2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%e2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trade and Climate Policies Must Be Linked in Post-Kyoto World : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%e2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-9193</link>
		<dc:creator>Trade and Climate Policies Must Be Linked in Post-Kyoto World : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1123#comment-9193</guid>
		<description>[...] to Create Environment Police Force to Protect Amazon Biodiversity America&#8217;s Environmental Policy: Tactic or Strategy? Venezuela and China Sign a New Oil Deal International Climate Negotiations Criticized by Indigenous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Create Environment Police Force to Protect Amazon Biodiversity America&#8217;s Environmental Policy: Tactic or Strategy? Venezuela and China Sign a New Oil Deal International Climate Negotiations Criticized by Indigenous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SWJED</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%e2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8845</link>
		<dc:creator>SWJED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1123#comment-8845</guid>
		<description>Since this blog brought up the discussion about strategies and tactics... You do not choose between a &#8220;tactic&#8221; and a &#8220;strategy.&#8221;  Words have meaning - for a reason - and this blog seems to be playing &quot;word games&quot; in support of a particular political end. 
 
PulSamsara says - no one cares - and that has been one of our major problems - in Iraq, Afghanistan, now Pakistan and throughout the Long War.  You should care - because without a strategy that defines an end-state you merely have a number of tactical operations to satisfy the here and now - not long-range national security goals. 
 
&lt;i&gt;Strategy&lt;/i&gt;: A prudent idea or set of ideas for employing the instruments of national power in a synchronized and integrated fashion to achieve &lt;b&gt;theater, national, and/or multinational objectives&lt;/b&gt;.  
 
&lt;i&gt;Tactics&lt;/i&gt;: The military science that deals with &lt;b&gt;securing objectives set by strategy&lt;/b&gt;, especially the technique of deploying and directing troops, ships, and aircraft in effective maneuvers against an enemy. 
 
Obama was clueless concerning the difference between strategy and tactics.  As a President and Commander in Chief it is critical that he understands this - otherwise you have the White House Situation Room running battalions from DC while a particular country and / or region goes to shit in a hand basket. General Tommy Franks (former commander of US Central Command) did not understand the difference.  Neither did Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Bremmer, Feith, Rice and Perle - though admittedly some may have but chose the wrong strategy. 
 
Off soapbox - bottom line - to those that do &quot;get it&quot; - words have meaning - to those that &quot;do not get it&quot; - words are a parsing game.  McCain understands what is critical - Obama either does not - or does not care as long as he can parse words to ensure victory in November. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since this blog brought up the discussion about strategies and tactics&#8230; You do not choose between a &ldquo;tactic&rdquo; and a &ldquo;strategy.&rdquo;  Words have meaning &#8211; for a reason &#8211; and this blog seems to be playing &quot;word games&quot; in support of a particular political end.</p>
<p>PulSamsara says &#8211; no one cares &#8211; and that has been one of our major problems &#8211; in Iraq, Afghanistan, now Pakistan and throughout the Long War.  You should care &#8211; because without a strategy that defines an end-state you merely have a number of tactical operations to satisfy the here and now &#8211; not long-range national security goals.</p>
<p><i>Strategy</i>: A prudent idea or set of ideas for employing the instruments of national power in a synchronized and integrated fashion to achieve <b>theater, national, and/or multinational objectives</b>. </p>
<p><i>Tactics</i>: The military science that deals with <b>securing objectives set by strategy</b>, especially the technique of deploying and directing troops, ships, and aircraft in effective maneuvers against an enemy.</p>
<p>Obama was clueless concerning the difference between strategy and tactics.  As a President and Commander in Chief it is critical that he understands this &#8211; otherwise you have the White House Situation Room running battalions from DC while a particular country and / or region goes to shit in a hand basket. General Tommy Franks (former commander of US Central Command) did not understand the difference.  Neither did Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, Bremmer, Feith, Rice and Perle &#8211; though admittedly some may have but chose the wrong strategy.</p>
<p>Off soapbox &#8211; bottom line &#8211; to those that do &quot;get it&quot; &#8211; words have meaning &#8211; to those that &quot;do not get it&quot; &#8211; words are a parsing game.  McCain understands what is critical &#8211; Obama either does not &#8211; or does not care as long as he can parse words to ensure victory in November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PulSamsara</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/27/america%e2%80%99s-environmental-policy-tactic-or-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-8803</link>
		<dc:creator>PulSamsara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1123#comment-8803</guid>
		<description>The difference between a tactic and a strategy ? 
 
This is the kind of trivia that only a self important officer training school teacher could get excited about. 
 
Someone should tell John McCain... that no-one cares. 
Really. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between a tactic and a strategy ?</p>
<p>This is the kind of trivia that only a self important officer training school teacher could get excited about.</p>
<p>Someone should tell John McCain&#8230; that no-one cares.</p>
<p>Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

