Boxer: EPA Chief Lied to Congress About Carbon

pinnochioThe head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lied to Congress about his rejection of a request from California intended curb global warming emissions, according to one United States Senator.

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), who has called for EPA chief Stephen Johnson to resign, made the statement at a hearing on regulation of greenhouse gases under the U.S. Clean Air Act.

“You’ve shown that what Mr. Johnson told us is not the truth,” Boxer told Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Rhode Island Democrat, after lengthy questioning of the EPA’s Robert Meyers, who helped prepare Johnson for a meeting at the White House over the California decision.

Johnson denied California’s request for a waiver to impose tough new limits on climate-warming carbon dioxide emissions from cars and light trucks. That decision last December effectively blocked as many as 18 other states from following suit.

“It’s clear that a portion of the (EPA) staff believed one way, but the administrator at the end of the day made his decision based on the facts and the law,” said the EPA’s Jonathan Shradar. “If Senator Boxer wants to actually legislate and change the law, I imagine that’s what the people of California elected her to do.”

The EPA has not issued rules so far and the timeline for public comment and rulemaking on this issue make any action during the Bush administration unlikely.

Image credit: House of Sims via flickr under a Creative Commons License

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Senator Inhofe Vows a “Full Investigation” into “Suppressed” EPA Report on Climate Change

Senator Inhofe calls for a “full investigation” into what he terms as a cover-up of scientific data that “vindicates” his position that global warming is hoax. It’s either that or an increasingly desperate attempt to support an untenable position.

Sarah Palin on Energy: What a Switch!

Am I the only one who noticed that Sarah Palin has pulled a huge switchover when it comes to her take on energy policy?

Because it’s dramatic, and may presage the switch that I have been hoping for for a while: the divorce of the idea that a Conservative Environmentalist in politics is an oxymoron.

Tell us what you think: