Shale Development Suffering Due to Economic Crisis

oil shale mining

Earlier this year excitement and promise surrounded the possibilities of developing a domestic oil source through shale oil. Due to the current economic crisis much of these plans have been put on hold. The companies that were initiating these efforts are finding it difficult to borrow funds for their projects. In a November 10th EarthNews article Louis D’Amico, executive director of the Independent Oil and Gas Association of Pennsylvania states:

“We’re seeing people back down on their initial planned development [in the Marcellus] because of the lack of financing, among other issues out there. Companies are taking a conservative approach with their cash flows because they’re finding it difficult to borrow funds.”

While some companies are backing off the development of shale oil due to the economic crisis, there are still those who are cautiously continuing with the development of this domestic energy source. A US News & World Report article dated November 3, 2008 explains companies out West are cautiously continuing with shale development.

Those interested in developing this oil source have many obstacles to face environmentally and financially. Although new technologies may alleviate disruption of the environment surrounding the drilling sites, environmental concerns now center around ground water contamination beneath the surface where the drilling occurs. Also, the process of extracting shale oil requires massive amounts of energy. The bottom line is, if pursued, development of this oil/energy source being commercially produced may not be a realty for the next 10 to 15 years.

As we head in to a new administration, what will happen to the pursuit of domestic oil and energy sources both traditional and alternative? What impact does development of domestic oil sources have on energy independence or energy security? The pursuit of an energy independent America has been promised to us by President-elect Obama. It will be interesting to see in the coming months and years where that pursuit will take us.

Related Posts:

How Much Oil is Actually Left on this Planet? Should We Care?
House Gives America an Oil Change in Energy Policy
Billions of Barrels Under the Bakken Shale

Bush Administration Proposes ‘Fire Sale’ of Rocky Mountains for Oil Shale Development

Photo Credit: The Monkey Wrench Dad

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Senator Inhofe Vows a “Full Investigation” into “Suppressed” EPA Report on Climate Change

Senator Inhofe calls for a “full investigation” into what he terms as a cover-up of scientific data that “vindicates” his position that global warming is hoax. It’s either that or an increasingly desperate attempt to support an untenable position.

Sarah Palin on Energy: What a Switch!

Am I the only one who noticed that Sarah Palin has pulled a huge switchover when it comes to her take on energy policy?

Because it’s dramatic, and may presage the switch that I have been hoping for for a while: the divorce of the idea that a Conservative Environmentalist in politics is an oxymoron.

One Comment

  1. Heidi,

    You need to make a distinction between shale oil and shale gas. The photo and some of your commentary is related to shale oil which does take a significant amount of energy to extract. The Marcellus shale gas resource, of which Mr D’Amico speaks, and the several other shale gas plays, is a very different subject in terms of both its extraction as well as its cost/benefit analysis.

Tell us what you think: