Bush Ignores Clean Water Act in New Mountaintop Mining Regs

george bush addressing friends of coal

The latest in a flurry of environmentally-devastating, last-minute rule changes from the Bush administration will give the go ahead for coal mining companies to fill valleys with the mining debris left over from lobbing-off mountaintops.

Earlier this week, the EPA and the White House Council on Environmental Quality approved a rule change that will allow coal mining companies to lawfully bury stream valleys and fill them with the tops of mountains that have been carved off for the coal they contain.

For years, coal mining companies were allowed to file for exemptions to a 25 year-old rule prohibiting the dumping of fill from mountaintop removal mining within 100 feet of streams and were granted them the vast majority of the time. In practice, the government had essentially been ignoring the rule for years; now they have codified that ignorance into a regulatory standard.

The practice of mountaintop removal (MTR) has buried 1200 miles of streams in Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia and elsewhere. The largest valley fills can approach 800 feet in height and swallow more than a mile of streambed. Along with the damage of riparian systems, MTR obviously requires the clearcutting of forests, increasing erosion and biodiversity loss.Mountaintop coal mining valley fill

The final step in MTR creates a sludge that contains coal dust and other sediment, and may contain heavy metals or chemicals that would impair water quality in streams and rivers if it were allowed to flow freely off the mine site. To keep any hazardous materials out of local water supplies, mine operators contain the coal sludge in nearby valleys, behind huge earthen dams known as valley fills.

It is hard to see how the new rule abides by the Clean Water Act which requires the federal government to protect all streams and rivers from being dumped in. Edward C. Hopkins, a policy analyst at the Sierra Club, said: “The E.P.A.’s own scientists have concluded that dumping mining waste into streams devastates downstream water quality. By signing off on this rule, the agency has abdicated its responsibility.”

Sierra Club executive director wrote, “This new rule is so bad that the governors of two of the most-affected states, Kentucky’s Steven Beshear and Tennessee’s Phil Bredesen, opposed it, Beshear saying it would increase pollution of Kentucky’s “beautiful natural resources.”

It is not entirely clear how president-elect Obama will handle the new mining waste rule. As a candidate, Barack Obama expressed serious concerns about the environmental implications of mountaintop mining, telling one environmental organization, “We have to find more environmentally sound ways of mining coal than simply blowing the tops off mountains.”

The new mining debris rule will join a litany of Bush administration midnight regulatory changes that are particularly damaging to the environment, including a rule change permitting the development of oil shale and another that creates an exemption for perchlorate, a known neurotoxin found at unsafe levels in the drinking water of millions of Americans.

The Department of Interior plans to make the rule final in December after briefing members of Congress this week and next. It will likely go into effect 30 days after that.

Related:
Bank of America’s Coal-Funding Concessions Delight Climate Activists
Bank of America Divests from Mountaintop Removal, Refocuses on “Clean Coal”
Bush Administration Proposes Fire Sale of Rocky Mountains for Oil Shale Development

Images: 1. WhiteHouse.gov; 2. NASA

Tweet This Post

You might also like:

Add a comment or question

Other Views from Red, Green, and Blue

Scottish highlands

Environmental Protest Round-Up 25 September 2009

In Peru, the government has acted on the financially troubled and environmentally challenged Doe Run Peru smelter. Their response to the closure of the site has been to give the operators a 30-month extension on their previous environmental clean-up deadline.

Is Nuclear “The Best Solution On Climate Change”?

A few weeks ago Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) called for a new energy solution. A solution that came in the form of 100 new nuclear power plants. That vision has not left the republicans’ eyes. And on Tuesday, Senator Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) added his two cents.

7 Comments

  1. We have sadly witnessed eight years of both neglect and disconnect, as few new protective laws have been enacted and the ones on the books often ignored. It has been a hallmark of this administration to enact policies that directly contradict existing laws. Hopefully we will soon return to a method of government that is not only lawful, but acts in a manner that respects the planet.

  2. [...] enough, this big announcement comes at the heels of news that the Environmental Protection Agency is supporting a proposed Bush Administration rollback of regulat… in Appalachia. The stream buffer zone, enacted in 1983, prohibited the dumping of [...]

  3. In the post (GRD) great republican depression era, all errors against the environment will face a severe reversal, and the U.S.A. will go Solar thermal, Electric – just as Spain and Portugal have! Carbon Emission taxes will pay for Solar – PERPETUAL energy sources. No longer called by the unfamiliar title “renewable” a misnomer at best, Solar, wind and wave power are PERPETUAL by definition. Yes Yankee Doodle! we have reached the Holy grail of physics, a perpetual POWER SOURCE, and we are not even considering the now proven to be expensive beyond reach science myth of fusion or even cold fusion! We don’t need to! We have Solar! a PERPETUAL power source! No bull shit, no oil baron attached, no small OPEC countries to feed and defend, no Sunnis wars to fight for oil, just plain Solar, thermal power – once the plant is built in the deserts of the Southwestern U.S.A.(at home) it doesn’t need to be sent money every few months, it never – NEVER – runs dry! And for the cost of that goddamn Iraq war, we are guaranteed power! Remember, we have never seen a single drop of Iraqi oil in the U.S.A. What the hell did we die for? Why did we spend the money?

  4. You filthy conniving harlot!

  5. [...] Bush administration has released several controversial rule changes and “clarifications” over the last few months that have put even the most critical of [...]

  6. [...] Worse Than Originally Thought Clean Coal? Storage Failure Covers 12 Homes, 400 Acres with Toxic Ash Bush Ignores Clean Water Act in New Mountaintop Mining Regs Tennessee Coal Slurry Retention Pond Disaster [video] [...]

Tell us what you think: