<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Cotton Goes Green (or at least Greener)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Peanut Butter Cost America : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-41215</link>
		<dc:creator>What Peanut Butter Cost America : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1845#comment-41215</guid>
		<description>[...] if peanut farmers drop their peanut crop, the soil will be used to grow an extra cotton crop, and that is a highly intensively managed crop, requiring irrigation, pesticides and fertilisers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if peanut farmers drop their peanut crop, the soil will be used to grow an extra cotton crop, and that is a highly intensively managed crop, requiring irrigation, pesticides and fertilisers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Sexton</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-17844</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 13:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1845#comment-17844</guid>
		<description>Hi Ramon! Nice point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ramon! Nice point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon Collins</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-17732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1845#comment-17732</guid>
		<description>Nice writing, Kay. You just give us the facts (ma&#039;m), without editorializing. 
 
I agree, the sooner the Chinese stop emulating American agri-business -- profits before people -- the better off their textile industry will be. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writing, Kay. You just give us the facts (ma&#039;m), without editorializing.</p>
<p>I agree, the sooner the Chinese stop emulating American agri-business &#8212; profits before people &#8212; the better off their textile industry will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay Sexton</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-17723</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1845#comment-17723</guid>
		<description>Hi Paulo, yes it&#039;s something of a concern isn&#039;t it, that the business model China has chosen is non-organic and somewhat monopolistic?  
 
But having seen some cotton production facilities there, I&#039;ve got to say that almost anything would be an improvement on the current water and pesticide intensive regime. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paulo, yes it&#039;s something of a concern isn&#039;t it, that the business model China has chosen is non-organic and somewhat monopolistic? </p>
<p>But having seen some cotton production facilities there, I&#039;ve got to say that almost anything would be an improvement on the current water and pesticide intensive regime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulo Pereira</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/12/chinese-cotton-goes-green-or-at-least-greener/comment-page-1/#comment-17720</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulo Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1845#comment-17720</guid>
		<description>Better Cotton is nor organic, itś not organic grow cotton. Better cotton is GMO cotton. That can&#039;t be good. A lot of people involved in organic textiles are against the &quot;better cotton&quot; iniciative because it stands against all that we care about, it&#039;s against  farmers and Earth. I think hard to belive that going the GMO way and placing the control of the production in tha hands of a few large enterprises that will sell the seeds  is good. It&#039;s not. It&#039;s politics and monopolies. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better Cotton is nor organic, itś not organic grow cotton. Better cotton is GMO cotton. That can&#039;t be good. A lot of people involved in organic textiles are against the &quot;better cotton&quot; iniciative because it stands against all that we care about, it&#039;s against  farmers and Earth. I think hard to belive that going the GMO way and placing the control of the production in tha hands of a few large enterprises that will sell the seeds  is good. It&#039;s not. It&#039;s politics and monopolies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

