<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressman Asks Coast Guard to Delay Offshore Wind Farm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cape Cod Offshore Wind Farm Cleared for Take Off : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-21522</link>
		<dc:creator>Cape Cod Offshore Wind Farm Cleared for Take Off : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1856#comment-21522</guid>
		<description>[...] and U.S. Coast Guard on whether it would interfere with airplane and marine radar. Based on previous official statements from the Coast Guard, there is good reason  to believe that the effects on marine radar will be deemed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and U.S. Coast Guard on whether it would interfere with airplane and marine radar. Based on previous official statements from the Coast Guard, there is good reason  to believe that the effects on marine radar will be deemed [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Lorusso</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-17996</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Lorusso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1856#comment-17996</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to make defamatory suggestions, like that by Dennis, about Oberstar. He&#8217;s probably just trying to do his job, and his liberal, pro-environment, and honest credentials can&#8217;t really be questioned.&quot; 
 
There was a public consultation. 
 
This is an OFFSHORE wind farm. How was marine radar and safety not on the top of the list? In what universe would the Coast Guard and other affected  parties not have given their professional opinion already? 
 
Which means if your assertion is true then both the regulators and the interested parties have been completely incompetent during the last 8 years. In which case we&#039;d need more than 60 days to get the job right because they&#039;d all need to be replaced first, including whoever was in charge of the coast guard at the time. 
 
Many people complain about how long civil authority decisions take. Now they have to sit on their hands for another 60 days because somebody couldn&#039;t be bothered to speak up before? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I don&rsquo;t think it&rsquo;s fair to make defamatory suggestions, like that by Dennis, about Oberstar. He&rsquo;s probably just trying to do his job, and his liberal, pro-environment, and honest credentials can&rsquo;t really be questioned.&quot;</p>
<p>There was a public consultation.</p>
<p>This is an OFFSHORE wind farm. How was marine radar and safety not on the top of the list? In what universe would the Coast Guard and other affected  parties not have given their professional opinion already?</p>
<p>Which means if your assertion is true then both the regulators and the interested parties have been completely incompetent during the last 8 years. In which case we&#039;d need more than 60 days to get the job right because they&#039;d all need to be replaced first, including whoever was in charge of the coast guard at the time.</p>
<p>Many people complain about how long civil authority decisions take. Now they have to sit on their hands for another 60 days because somebody couldn&#039;t be bothered to speak up before? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-17913</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 04:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1856#comment-17913</guid>
		<description>Sounds like during this regulatory purgatory, everyone has had a chance to way in... except operators of marine vessels and the Coast Guard employees who have to risk their lives to protect them. 
 
It sounds like all he is doing is asking for the opportunity to hear input from these stakeholders.  Transparency, openness, and public discussion are good things and I wonder why a period of formal public notice and comment was&#039;t done by the Coast Guard commandant himself to begin with.  It might be legally required and it&#039;s a good idea anyway. 
 
I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to make defamatory suggestions, like that by Dennis, about Oberstar.  He&#039;s probably just trying to do his job, and his liberal, pro-environment, and honest credentials can&#039;t really be questioned. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like during this regulatory purgatory, everyone has had a chance to way in&#8230; except operators of marine vessels and the Coast Guard employees who have to risk their lives to protect them.</p>
<p>It sounds like all he is doing is asking for the opportunity to hear input from these stakeholders.  Transparency, openness, and public discussion are good things and I wonder why a period of formal public notice and comment was&#039;t done by the Coast Guard commandant himself to begin with.  It might be legally required and it&#039;s a good idea anyway.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair to make defamatory suggestions, like that by Dennis, about Oberstar.  He&#039;s probably just trying to do his job, and his liberal, pro-environment, and honest credentials can&#039;t really be questioned. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/13/congressman-asks-coast-guard-to-delay-offshore-wind-farm/comment-page-1/#comment-17858</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=1856#comment-17858</guid>
		<description>Looks like someone bought another Congressional crook. Bribing Congress is bad, m&#039;kay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like someone bought another Congressional crook. Bribing Congress is bad, m&#8217;kay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

