<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Lisa Jackson Supports California Emission Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Fuel Limits by 2016? : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-55154</link>
		<dc:creator>New Fuel Limits by 2016? : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2239#comment-55154</guid>
		<description>[...] Arnold Schwarzenegger is planning on attending the event, a big deal when one considers that California was leading the charge against Bush&#8217;s EPA to get the ability to set higher standards themselves.  Hopefully, this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Arnold Schwarzenegger is planning on attending the event, a big deal when one considers that California was leading the charge against Bush&#8217;s EPA to get the ability to set higher standards themselves.  Hopefully, this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAIVN</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-24109</link>
		<dc:creator>CAIVN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2239#comment-24109</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a strange world when a Democratic president does in six days what Republican governor could not convince a Republican president to do in four years of letter-writing, lawsuits and international embarrassment. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.caivp.org/article/issues/2009/1/26/state-emissions-standards-finally-approved&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.caivp.org/article/issues/2009/1/26/sta...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s a strange world when a Democratic president does in six days what Republican governor could not convince a Republican president to do in four years of letter-writing, lawsuits and international embarrassment.</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.caivp.org/article/issues/2009/1/26/state-emissions-standards-finally-approved" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.caivp.org/article/issues/2009/1/26/sta" rel="nofollow">http://www.caivp.org/article/issues/2009/1/26/sta</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BREAKING: Obama Tax Breaks for Solar and Wind Approved! : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-23220</link>
		<dc:creator>BREAKING: Obama Tax Breaks for Solar and Wind Approved! : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2239#comment-23220</guid>
		<description>[...] Facilities will have to be in place by 2012 to be eligible for the credit. Read our article on Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Supporting The California Waiver On Emissions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facilities will have to be in place by 2012 to be eligible for the credit. Read our article on Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Supporting The California Waiver On Emissions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-22032</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2239#comment-22032</guid>
		<description>Anyway you slice this one we are going to be in deep trouble if we don&#039;t get on with becoming energy independent. Oil is finite. We are using oil  globally at the rate of  2 X faster than new oil is being discovered. The high price of fuel the previous year has brought America to it&#039;s knees and done serious damage to our economy and society. Our nation better wake up and smell the coffee and realize oil is finite, it is running out faster than anyone realizes and it  is time to get on with utilizing alternative sources of energy. We should never give others that much power over our economy. America&#039;s need to become energy independent seems to be realized by only a select few.  Hopefully our new administration will move forward with this very important issue. I just read a really good book called The Manhattan Project of 2009 by Jeff Wilson.I highly recommend this book for anyone concerned about out economy and America&#039;s need to become more energy independent. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway you slice this one we are going to be in deep trouble if we don&#039;t get on with becoming energy independent. Oil is finite. We are using oil  globally at the rate of  2 X faster than new oil is being discovered. The high price of fuel the previous year has brought America to it&#039;s knees and done serious damage to our economy and society. Our nation better wake up and smell the coffee and realize oil is finite, it is running out faster than anyone realizes and it  is time to get on with utilizing alternative sources of energy. We should never give others that much power over our economy. America&#039;s need to become energy independent seems to be realized by only a select few.  Hopefully our new administration will move forward with this very important issue. I just read a really good book called The Manhattan Project of 2009 by Jeff Wilson.I highly recommend this book for anyone concerned about out economy and America&#039;s need to become more energy independent. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Wolfe</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-22025</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Wolfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2239#comment-22025</guid>
		<description>Keep hoping about Jackson (and get active). She herself is a political appointee! 
 
Science and rule of law are slogans - not policy commitments. 
 
You forgot to mention that Boxer chastised Jackson&#039;s non-committal answer on the California petition buy noting that Obama had pledged to issue it. Jackson merely said she would consider it. Huge difference. 
 
NJ was a plaintiff in the lawsuit - if Jackson couldn&#039;t give a straight answer adn firm commitment to that issue... 
 
The only tough questions Jackson faced came at the very end - after 3 hours and 20 minutes. All the mainstream press were not paying attention by then and missed how poor Jackson&#039;s record was in NJ. Go to the PEER website at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peer.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.peer.org&lt;/a&gt; for details on that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep hoping about Jackson (and get active). She herself is a political appointee!</p>
<p>Science and rule of law are slogans &#8211; not policy commitments.</p>
<p>You forgot to mention that Boxer chastised Jackson&#039;s non-committal answer on the California petition buy noting that Obama had pledged to issue it. Jackson merely said she would consider it. Huge difference.</p>
<p>NJ was a plaintiff in the lawsuit &#8211; if Jackson couldn&#039;t give a straight answer adn firm commitment to that issue&#8230;</p>
<p>The only tough questions Jackson faced came at the very end &#8211; after 3 hours and 20 minutes. All the mainstream press were not paying attention by then and missed how poor Jackson&#039;s record was in NJ. Go to the PEER website at <a href="http://www.peer.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.peer.org</a> for details on that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

