<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economic Stimulus Package Proposed Barrasso Amendment Would Exempt Projects from NEPA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/economic-stimulus-package-proposed-barrasso-amendment-would-exempt-projects-from-nepa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/economic-stimulus-package-proposed-barrasso-amendment-would-exempt-projects-from-nepa/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mridul Chadha</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/economic-stimulus-package-proposed-barrasso-amendment-would-exempt-projects-from-nepa/comment-page-1/#comment-28045</link>
		<dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2452#comment-28045</guid>
		<description>Without the NEPA review and proper environmental assessment we would be ignoring the possible social, economic, environmental and other effects these projects can have.  
 
Overlooking the NEPA review would not solve the purpose as one of the objectives of the bill is improving the state of environment. Therefore, the assessment agencies must complete the the procedure quickly and in an objective manner. They can hire more people and they could refer to EIA studies of similar projects done in the past to complete the procedure quickly but in an objective manner. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without the NEPA review and proper environmental assessment we would be ignoring the possible social, economic, environmental and other effects these projects can have. </p>
<p>Overlooking the NEPA review would not solve the purpose as one of the objectives of the bill is improving the state of environment. Therefore, the assessment agencies must complete the the procedure quickly and in an objective manner. They can hire more people and they could refer to EIA studies of similar projects done in the past to complete the procedure quickly but in an objective manner. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/05/economic-stimulus-package-proposed-barrasso-amendment-would-exempt-projects-from-nepa/comment-page-1/#comment-28032</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 09:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2452#comment-28032</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but how is the stimulus supposed to work if projects are delayed for 4 years during NEPA review? Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures. To characterize this as right-wing tree hating is missing the point, I think. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but how is the stimulus supposed to work if projects are delayed for 4 years during NEPA review? Extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures. To characterize this as right-wing tree hating is missing the point, I think. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

