<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Efficiency Tax Credits from the Stimulus Package</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/04/energy-efficiency-tax-credits-from-the-stimulus-package/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/04/energy-efficiency-tax-credits-from-the-stimulus-package/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: landlord</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/04/energy-efficiency-tax-credits-from-the-stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-44001</link>
		<dc:creator>landlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2695#comment-44001</guid>
		<description>Little landlord here (over one rental house).  I have a heatpump at the rental house that is in need of some repairs (as it is now beginning to age out after only 11 yrs...a bit early IMHO).   
 
Thinking I might be able to utilize an energy tax credit I thought it would be nice to now replace the unit with a high efficiency unit.  It would cost me more to replace the unit and I would not directly benefit from the lower operating cost although my tenants could.  I however would have a more reliable system and I really like the idea of having a unit that uses the newer more environmentally friendly refrigerant. 
 
But the tax credit appears to only be available to homeowners as the tax credit is for the taxpayer&#039;s primary residence.  So since I don&#039;t live at my rental unit and I don&#039;t really expect that my tenants want to dish out the 6 grand for a new high efficiency system for me...it appears that there is no tax incentive for this situation. 
 
Am I missing something?    
 
Most tenants are of lower income or are on a fixed income so a new high efficiency unit could really benefit them. 
 
So I am back to thinking I should just make another repair.  It is riskier for me because I know yet another repair is in the not to distant future.  It is more costly for my tenants and less beneficial for the environment.  
 
I am disappointed.  The repair is expected to be $1500.  A new high efficiency unit would be $6000.  which is a $4500 premium...a $3000 premium would be stretching it a bit for me but I would be willing to go that route if I could. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little landlord here (over one rental house).  I have a heatpump at the rental house that is in need of some repairs (as it is now beginning to age out after only 11 yrs&#8230;a bit early IMHO).  </p>
<p>Thinking I might be able to utilize an energy tax credit I thought it would be nice to now replace the unit with a high efficiency unit.  It would cost me more to replace the unit and I would not directly benefit from the lower operating cost although my tenants could.  I however would have a more reliable system and I really like the idea of having a unit that uses the newer more environmentally friendly refrigerant.</p>
<p>But the tax credit appears to only be available to homeowners as the tax credit is for the taxpayer&#039;s primary residence.  So since I don&#039;t live at my rental unit and I don&#039;t really expect that my tenants want to dish out the 6 grand for a new high efficiency system for me&#8230;it appears that there is no tax incentive for this situation.</p>
<p>Am I missing something?   </p>
<p>Most tenants are of lower income or are on a fixed income so a new high efficiency unit could really benefit them.</p>
<p>So I am back to thinking I should just make another repair.  It is riskier for me because I know yet another repair is in the not to distant future.  It is more costly for my tenants and less beneficial for the environment. </p>
<p>I am disappointed.  The repair is expected to be $1500.  A new high efficiency unit would be $6000.  which is a $4500 premium&#8230;a $3000 premium would be stretching it a bit for me but I would be willing to go that route if I could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TellTheTruth</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/04/energy-efficiency-tax-credits-from-the-stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-41920</link>
		<dc:creator>TellTheTruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2695#comment-41920</guid>
		<description>Too bad the energy credits only apply to homeowners making less than $45K/year.  Seems like it would be smart to offer everyone a tax break to make their homes more energy efficient. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad the energy credits only apply to homeowners making less than $45K/year.  Seems like it would be smart to offer everyone a tax break to make their homes more energy efficient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenskeptic</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/04/energy-efficiency-tax-credits-from-the-stimulus-package/comment-page-1/#comment-38325</link>
		<dc:creator>greenskeptic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2695#comment-38325</guid>
		<description>Great summary. Thanks for providing this -- always helpful to dig through the details -- and should be interesting to see how states line up for a piece of this or to provide additional incentives. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary. Thanks for providing this &#8212; always helpful to dig through the details &#8212; and should be interesting to see how states line up for a piece of this or to provide additional incentives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

