<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon Tax Bill Introduced in US Congress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude Taula</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-104822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude Taula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-104822</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the blog post. I really loved the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the blog post. I really loved the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike L</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-80933</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-80933</guid>
		<description>Its disheartening to listen to this debate of science VS non-science.98%+ of the worlds scientists agree on the climate change sinario, but we can get so bogged down by the ultra right wing pumping $$$ into the debate with the 1% that sees an alternate sinario... 
 
The &quot;Dumbing down of America is going to pay-off for the right wing.They know if they can keep people confused enough we don&#039;t have to do anything... 
 
The right wings wants to bring back the past and pretend there is no real problem.Many ancient civilizations have made the same mistakes but back then they could just move somewhere else...We have lost this option... 
 
Nearly 7 billion people on earth. Open your eyes. Read the hard science going on in this debate.Scientist are trained to challenge each others findings and debate, to them they are trying to give us there conclution but they must shout through the noise. 
 
Trully this is not a political issue. If 98% of astronomers said a asteroid was heading for the earth and we needed to do something NOW, would you agree with 2% and do nothing because its cheeper... 
 
PS Mars ice caps are made of frozen CO2... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its disheartening to listen to this debate of science VS non-science.98%+ of the worlds scientists agree on the climate change sinario, but we can get so bogged down by the ultra right wing pumping $$$ into the debate with the 1% that sees an alternate sinario&#8230;</p>
<p>The &quot;Dumbing down of America is going to pay-off for the right wing.They know if they can keep people confused enough we don&#039;t have to do anything&#8230;</p>
<p>The right wings wants to bring back the past and pretend there is no real problem.Many ancient civilizations have made the same mistakes but back then they could just move somewhere else&#8230;We have lost this option&#8230;</p>
<p>Nearly 7 billion people on earth. Open your eyes. Read the hard science going on in this debate.Scientist are trained to challenge each others findings and debate, to them they are trying to give us there conclution but they must shout through the noise.</p>
<p>Trully this is not a political issue. If 98% of astronomers said a asteroid was heading for the earth and we needed to do something NOW, would you agree with 2% and do nothing because its cheeper&#8230;</p>
<p>PS Mars ice caps are made of frozen CO2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JS</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-70886</link>
		<dc:creator>JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-70886</guid>
		<description>I think the main question we need to be asking is: Why is there even an existence of a carbon tax? You guys do know that man-made global warming has been proven to be a hoax to enact right-enfringing bills such as this, right? Let me ask you a simple question: How is making something as natural as C02 which plants NEED to make food and is one of the four building blocks for life on this planet, Natural? Do the research and you will see what i&#039;m talking about. Also, why is it that the polar ice caps on mars are melting and we&#039;re not even on that planet! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main question we need to be asking is: Why is there even an existence of a carbon tax? You guys do know that man-made global warming has been proven to be a hoax to enact right-enfringing bills such as this, right? Let me ask you a simple question: How is making something as natural as C02 which plants NEED to make food and is one of the four building blocks for life on this planet, Natural? Do the research and you will see what i&#039;m talking about. Also, why is it that the polar ice caps on mars are melting and we&#039;re not even on that planet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Still Undecided, International Agreement on Climate Treaty Seems Unlikely in 2009 : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-57669</link>
		<dc:creator>US Still Undecided, International Agreement on Climate Treaty Seems Unlikely in 2009 : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-57669</guid>
		<description>[...] the government to distribute emission permits to the industries free of cost. A bill proposing a nationwide carbon tax was also introduced in the US Congress but experts fear that, if implemented, the bill would put a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the government to distribute emission permits to the industries free of cost. A bill proposing a nationwide carbon tax was also introduced in the US Congress but experts fear that, if implemented, the bill would put a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ex-Pentagon Officials: Energy Efficiency Directly Related to National Security : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-55559</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-Pentagon Officials: Energy Efficiency Directly Related to National Security : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-55559</guid>
		<description>[...] government can infuse money into these project on its own, eventually there would be some kind of carbon tax or cap and trade scheme to raise money for these cash intensive projects. In addition, America has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] government can infuse money into these project on its own, eventually there would be some kind of carbon tax or cap and trade scheme to raise money for these cash intensive projects. In addition, America has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harder</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-50822</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Harder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-50822</guid>
		<description>It is true that a carbon tax adds to the cost of domestic goods and thus has a decided anti-competitive feature. However, just as Larson has proposed making the carbon tax revenue neutral to consumers, the cost impact of a carbon tax on domestic industrial users also can be neutralized. We would &#8220;recycle&#8221; the carbon tax revenue imbedded in their products back to them&#8212;but not in direct proportion to their carbon emissions. That way the anti-competitive cost impact is offset while the incentive for efficiency/alternative fuels remains. This would also save us from the competing idea of imposing fees on imports to offset the carbon tax they did not pay. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that a carbon tax adds to the cost of domestic goods and thus has a decided anti-competitive feature. However, just as Larson has proposed making the carbon tax revenue neutral to consumers, the cost impact of a carbon tax on domestic industrial users also can be neutralized. We would &ldquo;recycle&rdquo; the carbon tax revenue imbedded in their products back to them&mdash;but not in direct proportion to their carbon emissions. That way the anti-competitive cost impact is offset while the incentive for efficiency/alternative fuels remains. This would also save us from the competing idea of imposing fees on imports to offset the carbon tax they did not pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Opposes US Plans to Levy Carbon Tax on Imported Goods &#171; Environment News and Analysis</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-48217</link>
		<dc:creator>China Opposes US Plans to Levy Carbon Tax on Imported Goods &#171; Environment News and Analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-48217</guid>
		<description>[...] statements came almost a week after a carbon tax bill was introduced in the US Congresswhich called for levying an ‘carbon equivalency fee’ on imported products, in addition to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] statements came almost a week after a carbon tax bill was introduced in the US Congresswhich called for levying an ‘carbon equivalency fee’ on imported products, in addition to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China, US on Collision Course Over Carbon Tax on Traded Goods : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/15/carbon-tax-bill-introduced-in-us-congress/comment-page-1/#comment-42175</link>
		<dc:creator>China, US on Collision Course Over Carbon Tax on Traded Goods : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=2768#comment-42175</guid>
		<description>[...] statements came almost a week after a carbon tax bill was introduced in the US Congress which called for levying an &#8216;carbon equivalency fee&#8217; on imported products, in addition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] statements came almost a week after a carbon tax bill was introduced in the US Congress which called for levying an &#8216;carbon equivalency fee&#8217; on imported products, in addition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

