<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rain barrels illegal in Colorado, but tide may be changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-352484</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-352484</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t give a rats ass what the law is. That law is an unlawful order in my book. The rain belongs to God and I will use God&#039;s rain to water the plants that God created.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t give a rats ass what the law is. That law is an unlawful order in my book. The rain belongs to God and I will use God&#8217;s rain to water the plants that God created.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GK Scott</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-107428</link>
		<dc:creator>GK Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-107428</guid>
		<description>I would have been an extreme lawbreaker with two in my back yard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have been an extreme lawbreaker with two in my back yard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Kornswiet</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-106194</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Kornswiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-106194</guid>
		<description>Lots of great information, and quite simple to make your own if you have a few key tools.But unfortunately thanks to Mother Nature, until this past weekend’s glorious soaking, it didn’t do me any good without anything to capture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of great information, and quite simple to make your own if you have a few key tools.But unfortunately thanks to Mother Nature, until this past weekend’s glorious soaking, it didn’t do me any good without anything to capture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ib Andersen</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-75918</link>
		<dc:creator>Ib Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-75918</guid>
		<description>Rain barrel&#039;s work; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.envirosink.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;www.envirosink.com&lt;/a&gt;  
fill&#039;s it in the dry season. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rain barrel&#039;s work; and <a href="http://www.envirosink.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.envirosink.com</a> </p>
<p>fill&#039;s it in the dry season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E Cigarette</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-74759</link>
		<dc:creator>E Cigarette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-74759</guid>
		<description>you have to be kidding me.. thats ridiculous </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have to be kidding me.. thats ridiculous</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-69962</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-69962</guid>
		<description>this is why we are in debt and don&#039;t know what is going on in COngress... HOW silly is this?? 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electroniccigarettesource.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;electric cigarettes&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is why we are in debt and don&#039;t know what is going on in COngress&#8230; HOW silly is this??</p>
<p><a href="http://www.electroniccigarettesource.com" rel="nofollow">electric cigarettes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Sharp</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-67320</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-67320</guid>
		<description>What kind of law is that? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of law is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colorado Dave</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-63026</link>
		<dc:creator>Colorado Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-63026</guid>
		<description>I bought a cool &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rain-barrel.net/rainwater-tank.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rain barrel&lt;a&gt; made from recycled materials that has a hosed diverter, I painted the hose and diverter the color of my house and hide the rain barrel under my porch! What rain barrel? :)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a cool <a href="http://www.rain-barrel.net/rainwater-tank.html" rel="nofollow">rain barrel&lt;a&gt; made from recycled materials that has a hosed diverter, I painted the hose and diverter the color of my house and hide the rain barrel under my porch! What rain barrel? <img src='http://c1redgreenandblueorg.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy B. Hurst</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-57417</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-57417</guid>
		<description>Stephen, thanks for bringing light to this as I am one of those Coloradoans who curses the ridiculous statute still on the books forbidding rainwater collection. One often overlooked dimension of this is that every time a new development is constructed with paved roads and stormwater drainage it does far more damage to the amount of locally available water than rainbarrels ever could. All of the water that was once falling to the ground and absorbing into the local aquifers is instead rolling off of roofs, into gutters, down driveways and into the stormwater processing system or right back into the river. So, not only does this system perpetuate the viability of the ridiculous prior appropriations laws, it dries up local aquifers in the process. A real lose-lose proposition for local water users. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen, thanks for bringing light to this as I am one of those Coloradoans who curses the ridiculous statute still on the books forbidding rainwater collection. One often overlooked dimension of this is that every time a new development is constructed with paved roads and stormwater drainage it does far more damage to the amount of locally available water than rainbarrels ever could. All of the water that was once falling to the ground and absorbing into the local aquifers is instead rolling off of roofs, into gutters, down driveways and into the stormwater processing system or right back into the river. So, not only does this system perpetuate the viability of the ridiculous prior appropriations laws, it dries up local aquifers in the process. A real lose-lose proposition for local water users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllegroMouse</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/07/rain-barrels-illegal-in-colorado-but-tide-may-be-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-57364</link>
		<dc:creator>AllegroMouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 13:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3232#comment-57364</guid>
		<description>The Province of Ontario did not have a ban on clothes lines.  Oh goodness not....I would have been an extreme lawbreaker with two in my back yard.  Some municipalities had bans on clotheslines for the very reason you stated.  (preserve the aesthetics of residential areas)  What the province of Ontario did, in order to save time and legal efforts of its citizens, it turned over all of the bans on clotheslines put in effect by municipalities.  This took the onus off of citizens trying to &quot;fight city hall&quot;.  As an Ontarian, I applaud that government for such a step.  The province does not intervene often in municipal matters, but in the interest of the environment, I am glad it did this time!   
Thanks for the blog post! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Province of Ontario did not have a ban on clothes lines.  Oh goodness not&#8230;.I would have been an extreme lawbreaker with two in my back yard.  Some municipalities had bans on clotheslines for the very reason you stated.  (preserve the aesthetics of residential areas)  What the province of Ontario did, in order to save time and legal efforts of its citizens, it turned over all of the bans on clotheslines put in effect by municipalities.  This took the onus off of citizens trying to &quot;fight city hall&quot;.  As an Ontarian, I applaud that government for such a step.  The province does not intervene often in municipal matters, but in the interest of the environment, I am glad it did this time!  </p>
<p>Thanks for the blog post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

