<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military, Policy Experts See Climate Change as National Security Issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Security Project</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-93953</link>
		<dc:creator>American Security Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3411#comment-93953</guid>
		<description>[...] http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-securit...   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-securit.." rel="nofollow">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-securit..</a>.   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleanTechnica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pentagon to Include Climate Change in Major New Defense Review</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-81717</link>
		<dc:creator>CleanTechnica &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pentagon to Include Climate Change in Major New Defense Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3411#comment-81717</guid>
		<description>[...] In addressing climate change, the QDR would vindicate numerous military veterans and veterans&#8217; organizations that have advocated for climate action in recent years, including Operation Free and VoteVets.  Last spring a dozen retired senior officers called on the Pentagon to address climate change as an &#8220;urgent&#8221; national security threat.  At Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings last summer, retired Navy Vice Admiral Lee F. Gunn stated that &#8220;climate change poses a clear and present danger.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addressing climate change, the QDR would vindicate numerous military veterans and veterans&#8217; organizations that have advocated for climate action in recent years, including Operation Free and VoteVets.  Last spring a dozen retired senior officers called on the Pentagon to address climate change as an &#8220;urgent&#8221; national security threat.  At Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings last summer, retired Navy Vice Admiral Lee F. Gunn stated that &#8220;climate change poses a clear and present danger.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pentagon to Include Climate Change in Major New Defense Review &#171; Smart Power Community</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-81610</link>
		<dc:creator>Pentagon to Include Climate Change in Major New Defense Review &#171; Smart Power Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3411#comment-81610</guid>
		<description>[...] In addressing climate change, the QDR would vindicate numerous military veterans and veterans’ organizations that have advocated for climate action in recent years, including Operation Free andVoteVets.  Last spring a dozen retired senior officers called on the Pentagon to address climate change as an “urgent” national security threat.  At Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings last summer, retired Navy Vice Admiral Lee F. Gunn stated that “climate change poses a clear and present danger.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addressing climate change, the QDR would vindicate numerous military veterans and veterans’ organizations that have advocated for climate action in recent years, including Operation Free andVoteVets.  Last spring a dozen retired senior officers called on the Pentagon to address climate change as an “urgent” national security threat.  At Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings last summer, retired Navy Vice Admiral Lee F. Gunn stated that “climate change poses a clear and present danger.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Pangburn</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/22/military-policy-experts-see-climate-change-as-national-security-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-61895</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Pangburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3411#comment-61895</guid>
		<description>Important relevant science is not in the curriculum to become a Climate Scientist. Thus they do not recognize the significance of accepted paleo temperature data. With understanding of the missing science and knowledge of the data, it is trivial to conclude that NET feedback from average global temperature is not significantly positive. Being unaware of this constraint Climate Scientists have not calculated feedback correctly and/or all feedbacks have not been accounted for. Without NET positive feedback the Global Climate models predict that Global Warming from doubling atmospheric carbon dioxide will NOT be significant. Without significant Global Warming from increased carbon dioxide, human use of fossil fuels has no significant influence on climate change. See the pdfs linked from &lt;a href=&quot;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;...&lt;/a&gt; for the evidence, to identify the missing science and to see the cause of the temperature run-up in the late 20th century. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Important relevant science is not in the curriculum to become a Climate Scientist. Thus they do not recognize the significance of accepted paleo temperature data. With understanding of the missing science and knowledge of the data, it is trivial to conclude that NET feedback from average global temperature is not significantly positive. Being unaware of this constraint Climate Scientists have not calculated feedback correctly and/or all feedbacks have not been accounted for. Without NET positive feedback the Global Climate models predict that Global Warming from doubling atmospheric carbon dioxide will NOT be significant. Without significant Global Warming from increased carbon dioxide, human use of fossil fuels has no significant influence on climate change. See the pdfs linked from <a href="http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&amp;linkbox=true" rel="nofollow">http://climaterealists.com/index.php?tid=145&#038;&#8230;</a> for the evidence, to identify the missing science and to see the cause of the temperature run-up in the late 20th century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

