<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Pentagon&#8217;s War Against Carbon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/11/the-pentagons-war-against-carbon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/11/the-pentagons-war-against-carbon/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilding the Lily on Green Jobs : Red, Green, and Blue</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/11/the-pentagons-war-against-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-63937</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilding the Lily on Green Jobs : Red, Green, and Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3494#comment-63937</guid>
		<description>[...] on Red Green and Blue&#8217;s lead last week, today&#8217;s New York Times editorial notes that the White House and their Congressional allies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Red Green and Blue&#8217;s lead last week, today&#8217;s New York Times editorial notes that the White House and their Congressional allies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTF</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/11/the-pentagons-war-against-carbon/comment-page-1/#comment-63132</link>
		<dc:creator>CTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3494#comment-63132</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a good thing that health care has stolen the spotlight.  As it stands now, Waxman-Markey is ineffective at best.  It&#039;s time to take a serious look at the alternative that economists and scientists have advocated from the beginning: a revenue-neutral carbon tax. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#039;s a good thing that health care has stolen the spotlight.  As it stands now, Waxman-Markey is ineffective at best.  It&#039;s time to take a serious look at the alternative that economists and scientists have advocated from the beginning: a revenue-neutral carbon tax. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

