<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clunkers for Cadillacs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/clunkers-for-cadillacs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/clunkers-for-cadillacs/</link>
	<description>Patriotism that loves our country, our land, and our planet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: From Climate Change to Cap-and-trade: Something Rotten in Denmark? &#124; CleanTechies Blog - CleanTechies.com</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/clunkers-for-cadillacs/comment-page-1/#comment-63932</link>
		<dc:creator>From Climate Change to Cap-and-trade: Something Rotten in Denmark? &#124; CleanTechies Blog - CleanTechies.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 19:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3503#comment-63932</guid>
		<description>[...] the Senate&#8230;if one can. The US may be left to tout the very flawed and not very original Cash For Clunkers program as its most progressive recent climate change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Senate&#8230;if one can. The US may be left to tout the very flawed and not very original Cash For Clunkers program as its most progressive recent climate change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/clunkers-for-cadillacs/comment-page-1/#comment-63444</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 20:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3503#comment-63444</guid>
		<description>If the owner of a clunker that gets 18mpg drives 15,000 miles per year and trades it in for a truck that gets 22 mpg, they will save 318 gallons of gas per year.  In order for the owner of a 24 mpg clunker to save the same amount of gas, over the same number of miles driven, they would have to buy a new car that gets 48 mpg. 
CFC isn&#039;t perfect, but it&#039;s not nearly as bad as mpg numbers make it seem.  We need to start thinking of more useful rating systems. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the owner of a clunker that gets 18mpg drives 15,000 miles per year and trades it in for a truck that gets 22 mpg, they will save 318 gallons of gas per year.  In order for the owner of a 24 mpg clunker to save the same amount of gas, over the same number of miles driven, they would have to buy a new car that gets 48 mpg.</p>
<p>CFC isn&#039;t perfect, but it&#039;s not nearly as bad as mpg numbers make it seem.  We need to start thinking of more useful rating systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russ</title>
		<link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/clunkers-for-cadillacs/comment-page-1/#comment-63222</link>
		<dc:creator>russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/?p=3503#comment-63222</guid>
		<description>Environmental Economist? That is a new term for me. 
 
I suppose it requires the same qualification as the anomoyus but oft quoted &#039;environmentalist&#039; or &#039;scientist&#039; or &#039;whatever&#039;. 
 
In their panic to show something for all the recovery bucks spent, our idiot representatives finally found something that dumps money into the economy - immediately. 
 
Flowers are considered green - why not ask for people to be able to spend the money on petunias? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Environmental Economist? That is a new term for me.</p>
<p>I suppose it requires the same qualification as the anomoyus but oft quoted &#039;environmentalist&#039; or &#039;scientist&#039; or &#039;whatever&#039;.</p>
<p>In their panic to show something for all the recovery bucks spent, our idiot representatives finally found something that dumps money into the economy &#8211; immediately.</p>
<p>Flowers are considered green &#8211; why not ask for people to be able to spend the money on petunias?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

