After a campaign that resulted not only in victory, but in the transcendence of Barack Obama to something beyond a political figure and the elevation of David Axelrod to membership in the Rove/Carville College of Cardinals in American political life, the White House has not had much time to bask in victory’s glow. The economy remains in the tank, Afghanistan is drawing more frequent comparisons to Vietnam, and the health care and climate change fights have been taxing.
Yesterday, Obama hopped a plane to Denmark for a whirlwind Scandinavian tour where it was thought that his presence and pitch might push Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Olympics across the goal line. Instead, ChiTown did not make it out of the first round of balloting. Safe to say that if the White House knew that, Obama would not have made the trip. The failure marked the first – and probably last – time that a sitting US President schilled in front of an IOC selection committee.
The miscalculation is a familiar one. Just after Labor Day, POTUS addressed a joint session of Congress to drive home his point on the urgency of health care reform happening this year. Now barely into October, the only Senate health care bill thought to have a chance on the floor emerged from committee with no bipartisan support. And, as October begins it is clear that if any health care reform bill is signed in 2009, it will not include the now notorious “public option.”
In both cases, the White House made the decision to put their guy out there, but – evidently – no one counted the votes beforehand. The situation is eerily similar to the early administration flubs in the appointments process (i.e., the Daschle false start and the Judd Gregg quagmire). Any good party whip knows that you do not bring a bill to the floor until you know how the roll is going to be called.
As a result of Denmark, Obama winds up wearing a piece of a defeat that was inevitable and it was not even his fight. The Chicago Olympics story is clearly being played up for everything – and more – than its worth by the Right, but it is worth considering why – given that the Chicago bid was circling the drain – Obama let himself get dragged down with it?
When the call came asking for his support, White House staffers should have told the Chicago team to spend 48 hours having coffee with everyone who held a vote, and bring back their tally. If it looked close, then Obama has a tough call to make. But, if they cannot bring back a straw poll or if they bring back numbers that show the Windy City being blown away, then the White House has an easy answer: “love to help, but…”
As the world closes in on December’s big UN climate change conference — back in Copenhagen — it begs the question: is the White House strategy informed by good ground-level information on where other parties sit? Clearly, that strategy includes putting pressure on reluctant Senators with the prospect (read: threat) of EPA regulation of emissions in the absence of comprehensive legislation, even something as watered-down as Waxman-Markey. The upside to handing things off to Lisa Jackson is that it may force the hands of some of the upper Midwest Dems Obama needs to get to 60. And, even if it is not enough of a prod to move a bill through the Senate, it allows Obama to fly his flag in Copenhagen.
But, what if they are not close to 60? What if the lever is not the right one to swing the votes they need. Based on their recent due diligence, it is difficult to say whether the White House even knows where their votes are, who can be swung, and how. That said, should they roll the dice with an EPA plan? How will the inevitable backlash inside the US look on the global stage?
Strong political interests are already lining up against the idea of an executive power move on carbon, and with a lot of Dems looking more vulnerable for the mid-terms in 2010, you have to wonder if the move does not just paint Obama back into a corner and have allies running in the other direction on climate change.
On the campaign trail – in spite of Reverend Wright – Obama earned the gloss “No Drama Obama.” A little less than a year into his tenure as President, the shine is wearing off.
Flickr photo by RobBeer.


What a shame the racketeering scum of the Chicago Machine won’t have this windfall to milk.
And aren’t things going great since Valerie Jarret has been running the country?
…besides, Rio has better looking fans !
IOC just gave Obama the perfect out to stay home from Copenhagen. Absolutely no need to go back there now that we have the world's proxy on the post-Bush US and it a RESOUNDING thumbs down. Time to tell the EU to work with Brazil on climate change as Obama now has more important things to do at home.
It's time to throw a hard pitch at heads of all the EU countries that doomed Chicago and apparently have also made the informed decision they no longer want the US media and corporations to fund the tarnished Olympic ideal.
Turnabout is fair play and it's time for Obama to narrow his focus to more pressing homefront issues only. Maybe the US can turn up at the next climate change conference.
Interesting side note: in today's NYT, the Chicago "bid leader" cites "regional bloc voting" and not USOC infighting as the reason for Chitown's last-place finish.
Still does not absolve the political sin: either you knew the voting blocs before Obama came and did not factor it in; or, you didn't know. Either one is an inexcusable strategic blunder when it comes to the question of making POTUS look like cannon fodder.
Sorry, the link to NYT story is http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/sports/04usoc.h...
Meet The Press addressed this question on NBC. Obviously, I am with Mike Murphy, who I think makes a good nono-partisan point about what he refers to as "political professionalism."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/33163503#...