A new Zogby poll showing declining concern about climate change in the Unites States also shows that those who are least able to afford rising energy prices–the kind of upward movement brought on by climate legislation–are the most likely to support climate and energy policies that would have that effect.
When it comes to the personal changes that may be required as part of a national plan of action to address climate change, Zogby says that 44 percent of Americans believe the U.S. government should act to reduce energy use in the U.S. even if that means significant personal lifestyle changes.
But here’s the kicker. Those from least wealthy households (earning under $25,000 per year) are most likely to agree with the U.S. government trying to reduce energy use despite how it could impact their personal lifestyles – 62% agree, compared to 35% of those with $75,000 to $100,000 in household income.
A pretty surprising result, to say the least. But what does it all mean? It flies in the face of the commonly-held perception that poorer Americans are universally opposed to aggressive climate and clean energy policies because of the impact on their finances.
Next time I see one of those energy ads with Edward the economist, Paula the plumber or Harry the homemaker explaining how climate legislation would necessarily cripple the economy and unfairly punish hard-working American families, I’m going to think back to this poll.
Follow Tim Hurst on twitter
Photo: Jeffrey Beall via flickr/CC 2.0
About Timothy B. Hurst
Timothy,
Very interesting poll. Thanks for pointing it out
Yes, but….
A significant fraction of Poor Americans (probably 66%+) got to be in their condition because they made poor choices. A choice to "sacrifice for the sake of climate" just continues the record.
Smarten up, people!
This makes sense to me because I can see that people that are used to living a life of luxury would have a hard time cutting back. I believe this may also demonstrate that make a lot of money are probably profiting off of energy and other things like that and would want to avoid regulations because it may not only effect their lifestyles but also their pocket books. I would like to see more studies like this with peoples occupations, hobbies, and investments included to see if we could get an objective view on the subject and see what ethical/moral/personal/global standards people had in mind when being polled.