Center Nuclear_simpsons

Published on June 23rd, 2010 | by Jeremy Bloom


TED Talk: Pro vs Con on Nuclear Energy

Should we be taking a serious second look at Nuclear Energy?

There have always been those – even after Three Mile Island and Chernobyl – who have been staunch supporters. But the country hasn’t built a new nuclear plant in three decades – among other reasons, nobody would finance them.

With climate change the biggest potential disaster facing humanity, there are even environmentalists who now think nuclear power is actually a lower risk. The Obama administration seems to be on board – the recent stimulus package included billions of dollars in direct and indirect subsidies for the industry.

Take a look at this debate from TED, in which Stewart Brand and Mark Z. Jacobson go at it, and then tell us what you think.


Well? Is nuclear power the work of the devil? Or is this a case of “The Devil we know is better than the Devil we can barely imagine”?

And… did this debate influence your thinking?

About Stewart Brand –  Since the counterculture Sixties, Stewart Brand has been a critical thinker and innovator who helped lay the foundations of our internetworked world. Full bio and more links

About Mark Z. Jacobson –  At Stanford, Mark Z. Jacobson uses numerical models to study the effects of energy systems and vehicles on climate and air pollution, and to analyze renewable energy resources. Full bio and more links

Tags: , , ,

About the Author

Jeremy Bloom is the Editor of RedGreenAndBlue.

6 Responses to TED Talk: Pro vs Con on Nuclear Energy

  1. Nuclear energy is by far the best energy choice for a carbon free energy future.

  2. Pingback: After the Gulf Oil Disaster You Should be Asking: How Much Safer is the Nuclear Industry? : Red, Green, and Blue

  3. Pingback: No more nuclear power for Switzerland – Red, Green, and Blue

  4. Pingback: Germany also says nein to nuclear power – Red, Green, and Blue

  5. Sherry says:

    What I didn’t hear in this debate is how we reduce the amount of energy we use. Seems that this is the place to start.

    • Rizkie says:

      There'll be a panmilierry investment. The nice thing though , is that in the light of depleting resources, many executives are supplying their voters grants to help with the price of installing solar equipment. Remember that if there's excess power produced by a home solar system it can be sold back to the power company.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Back to Top ↑