Food food safety act... american gothic

Published on December 9th, 2010 | by Jeremy Bloom

12

Is the Food Safety Bill a Blessing or a Corporatist Curse?

For a few days it looked like the controversial Food Safety Modernization Act (S 510) was dead in the water. Technical issues meant it was unlikely to make it through both houses in the last, crazy days of the current Congress.

But it now appears that it WILL make it through – it’s been attached in whole to the Continuing Resolution, the $1 trillion-dollar bill that funds the entire government through next September. Since intra-party sniping shot down the regular budget bills that should have been passed by now, a Continuing Resolution is the only way to keep the government running. It ought to pass before the politicians go home for the holidays, and now, if it does, the Food Safety Modernization Act gets dragged across the finish line with it.

The bill was initially meant to deal with food safety issues like the recent tomato, egg and beef recalls, and prevent future outbreaks. But as always, lobbyists had a hand in writing the bill, and most Congressional staffers are very far removed from the needs of the average American with a backyard kitchen garden.

Rep. James McGovern (D-MA) told Food Safety News, “I’m baffled by the controversy. Anyone who’s been watching remembers recall after recall after recall.” And yet the controversy continues…

Is this a good thing?

If you’re like me, you’ve heard a lot of crazy talk about the FSMA. “It’s going to protect our children from the big corporate farms.” “No! It’s going to allow the big corporate farms to take over the world!” “It’ll ban seed saving so we’ll have to buy all of our seeds from Monsanto!” “No, it’s perfectly fine, nothing to see here,  trust our friends in the government.”

So which is it? Or, (as with most things) is it a little of both?

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, “While America has one of the safest and most abundant food supplies in the world, each year one in four people are sickened by food-borne illness and as many as 5,000 people die from food poisoning.” Juxtaposing those two statements takes a special kind of nerve. But will this bill do anything at all to deal with the reality of food safety?

I’m going to pull a few sources here, and hopefully we can get to the bottom of this.

On the bright side

Food expert Michael Pollan calls this “The best opportunity in a generation to improve the safety of the American food supply,” noting:

  • The bill would, for the first time, give the F.D.A., which oversees 80 percent of the nation’s food, the authority to test widely for dangerous pathogens and to recall contaminated food.
  • The agency would finally have the resources and authority to prevent food safety problems, rather than respond only after people have become ill.
  • The bill would also require more frequent inspections of large-scale, high-risk food-production plants.
  • Last summer, when thousands of people were infected with salmonella from filthy, vermin-infested henhouses in Iowa, Americans were outraged to learn that the F.D.A. had never conducted a food safety inspection at these huge operations that produce billions of eggs a year. The new rules might have kept those people – mainly small children and the elderly – from getting sick.
  • The law would also help to protect Americans from unsafe food produced overseas: for the first time, imported foods would be subject to the same standards as those made in the United States.

And while critics of the bill say it will cost $300 million a year, Pollan points out that the cost of food-born illness is $152 billion. Seems like a bargain.

-> Next Page: What’s covered?




Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

Jeremy Bloom is the Editor of RedGreenAndBlue.



12 Responses to Is the Food Safety Bill a Blessing or a Corporatist Curse?

  1. harmon says:

    Totalitarian governments’ primary tools for controlling citizenry are control of health care, control of energy, and control of food. Yet another voluminous, ambiguous bill that allows poltical appointees to write their owne rules, the FSB is yet another imposition of government control. Small producers will disappear to collective farms (sound familiar) and prices will soar. This bill also provides for “sterile seeds” in which resulting seeds are sterile. In a very few years, the government and selected business like Monsanto (Soros just became the #2 stockholder) control the food supply.

  2. If you stop listening to the hype and actually read the bill you will find that it is nothing but a power grab by the FDA and a way to harmonize U.S. law with Codex Alimentarius. Unlike corporate media puppets and traitors like Michael Pollan, whom I used to respect, I back up my words with proof:
    Here is the text of S.510 as passed by the Senate: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:3:./temp/~c111kxD1Nd::
    Here is the link to the OFFICIAL Codex Alimentarius website: http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp
    These are primary sources, not somebody’s opinion.
    When you read the bill, pay close attention to sections: 106, 208, 306(c)(5), 306(d), 404, and 401. Then take a close look at the Codex standards for vitamins and nutrients.
    Do your own research and think for yourselves!

  3. Pingback: "family-scale farmers" and Food Safety Modernization Act (S. 510) - Page 5

  4. FactChecker says:

    There was never anything in this bill that would have given a 10 yr sentence for selling raw milk. You’re reading too much Gumpert, and he’s reading too little.

    • Rebecca says:

      The criminal penalty provision was never in the bill to my knowledge, but we kept hearing that Leahy wanted to offer an amendment of that sort and that Reid nixed it.

  5. Steve Savage says:

    When Harry Reid quotes a statistic about 1 in 4 Americans getting food poisoning he does not point out that the vast majority of those events are because of people cross-contaminating foods on unclean cutting boards, leaving food at room temperature too long, etc in their own houses, and under-cooking meat. Obviously this bill will have nothing to do with that. As for the assertion that small/local means no food safety issues – do birds fly over local fields and poop or do they know that they are only supposed to do that over “factory farms?” It must come early in a birds training. The difference is that the CDC will never trace such incidents, not that it does not happen.

  6. Pingback: They’re still playing with our food « Hardscrabble Times

  7. Pingback: Food Safety Modernization Act, the Bill that Wouldn’t Die, is Dead – Red, Green, and Blue

  8. Pingback: Stick a Fork in It – The Food Safety Modernization Bill is Done – Planetsave.com: climate change and environmental news

  9. Pingback: Daily Update News » Food Safety Modernization Act, the Bill that Wouldn’t Die, is Dead – Red, Green, and Blue

  10. Pingback: Zombie Food Safety Act Ressurrected by Senate – Red, Green, and Blue

  11. Pingback: Jamie Oliver wants to know why pink slime is part of your child’s healthy school lunch – Red, Green, and Blue

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Back to Top ↑